What's new

Search results

  1. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    Just to clear any misunderstanding, mass energy equivalence does not require a mass to be accelerated to c, light speed, to get energy. Say we have a 1 kg gold bullion bar. If somehow you can make the bar disappear in "thin air" - or destroyed - you should get a huge amount of energy : E = 1 x...
  2. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    Just for those who may be interested. The promotion of Einstein's relativity theories and corresponding relativistic physics such as E=mc² is one big fraud perpetrated onto the world. The following paper of mine shows the full detail in one classic case by four top physicists from supposedly...
  3. C

    Elon Musk among experts urging a halt to AI training

    This is just fraud. They are doing reverse advertising, by pretension that AI will be a great threat towards humanity. What they aim for is to actually tell the world how great and powerful AI is. They would then make astronomical sums of money from AI companies. AI is downright dumb! AI is...
  4. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    I am not sure what you meant by "give us the mathematics of your theory". I have no knowldege of quantum mechanics. I have various paper at my website and they do have mathematics, though just only undergraduate calculus: "The Relativistic Mechanics of E=mc2 Fails" "Nuclear Binding Energy...
  5. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    OK. I do not wish to argue this point.
  6. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    It's OK. Everything is a matter of opinion.
  7. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    None of my papers would pass any of the more well known or "decent" journals. Nowadays, they want high mathematics to accompany physics. Even if an argument refuting Einstein's relativity is correct, it would never ever get published. Peer review is nothing much more than a closed exclusive...
  8. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    None!:( I don't ask that you review any of my original papers, just the 22 lines proof I included in my OP.
  9. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    An argument between two people - you and me - does not have any ending. It is not my aim to engage in any nonstop argument. My aim in my OP is to publish my findings why Einstein's relativity and E=mc² are wrong. It is to let others find out for themselves if they have any interest. My argument...
  10. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    A flawed experiment repeated a hundred times will give the same flawed hundred identical results. Repeated flawed interpretations have no scientific value. Just tell me, in my OP proof, where is the flaw if any? I have said all these "confirmed" are flawed, flawed experiments and flawed...
  11. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    I don't use Facebook, Instagram, Twitter nor chatGPT. Most serious posters just type out what they want to say and posts. This is the first time I find a post from a .png image. I have given in an earlier reply why I reject all and every claim about how special relativity has been verified by...
  12. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    "Fraud of E=mc²" https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/the-fraud-of-e-mc%C2%B2.2610555/ This is the most interesting thread that allowed me to debate fully; the thread has 219 posts, the longest ever allowed me ever. Still, in the end, the moderators want me out. You can read the reasons at the...
  13. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    Would your daily live suffer a wee bit if all of modern physics got dumped into the drain? Nothing that your are now enjoying of our modern world would be lost to you. Your internet would still be up, your fridge will still be good, your cars would still run. Your only lost may be stories from...
  14. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    I fully understand your position. The wiki page on special relativity says SR proven by "hundreds of of experiments" and even named a lists. But I reject all hundreds of the experimental proofs. There is this common misconception that science - especially physics - is absolutely proven if...
  15. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    Aristotle taught that heavier objects fall faster than lighter objects. It was only in the 16/17th century that Galileo demonstrated that Aristotle was wrong. It took 15 centuries for a cultish belief to be dispelled! The Catholic Church taught that the planets and the sun all orbited around...
  16. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    I have to admit my physics is not yet up to your mark.:(
  17. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    "At least you tried using some kind of scientific reasoning to reach your conclusion"; does it mean you really, really read a little few sentences from my homepage - that's great. You are a real gem of a person.:-)
  18. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    OK. You attempted a proper rebuttal. Because I cannot cut and paste from your post, I cannot reply to you in details. I just say all your points of rebuttal are incorrect. Sorry. I can only reply in details only if I can cut and paste from the post.
  19. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    I will try that forum later. You do not know the state of affairs in the mainstream physics world. It is almost official policy that "decent" physics journals (not the predatory journals that charge you and will publish anything) do not accept (anymore) any papers that attempt to critique the...
  20. C

    E=mc² invalid; much of modern physics as the Standard Model, QED, nuclear physics fictitious.

    Have I read English wrong? This subforum is: Science and Technology.
Back
Top Bottom