Instead of this, you should ask to lift ban from him.
Hindu angle always going to be there, because that is hypocrisy of highest order.
Facepalm, ECB cant ban other nationality players from international cricket, only there board and ICC can do this.
The ban is not from BCCI nor from ICC.
This isnt hypocrisy, that giving life ban for doing spot fixing in country cricket of England?
And lifting bans on other player for doing fixing in international cricket?
Vietnam cant repeat those years. Forget about it.
Neither PLA is of Korean war, nor Vietnam Army is of Vietnam war. Now this is almost next to impossible to sustain such high losses and that too for a decade.
I am using harsh word, but if Vietnam remained in her dreams & legacy of past Vietnam...
Vietnam should indeed reduce its Army.
And start to fund in Navy including amphibious operations, more submarine, ASW aircrafts like P-3. And more importantly start to fund in nuclear program and in delivery system.
I dont know Vietnam have any ungaurded nuclear reactor or not.
Sorry for that. Now I find official source.
http://grse.nic.in/page_news.php?page_id=131
But fact of the matter is that design was only for VN and SLN.
But it seems like SLN ordered 2 Coast Guard version of Saryu Class OPV, after its involvement in Libya Evacuation.
For Sri Lanka there is no...
The first 2 ship also include R&D cost.
This is possible indeed.
Further it seems weapon procurement is part of different tender
http://maxdefense.blogspot.in/2016/02/the-philippine-navys-frigate.html
There are geopolitical aspects too.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2811939/India-supply-four-naval-patrol-ships-Vietnam.html
Obviously they never show this as the contract was given by GoI, and not by VN directly.
Do you have full report link of that Expression of Interest. Thats pretty interesting...
How you know thats not come true? Lets wait and see, what Goa Shipyard Ltd producing for Vietnam.
@Carlosa We need to wait and see what is the GRSE weapon system offer to Philippines Navy, from there we can conclude many things.
If that is the case then why Indian Navy calling P-17A as...
http://www.livefistdefence.com/2015/09/exclusive-indo-israeli-lrsam-range.html
@Penguin These are very authenticated sources, these are not something like Janes which do analysis on something else and conclude something totally different.
The simple reason is USSR have to saturate the American CBG air defenses, while reverse was not true.
Nobody underestimating Onyx, all the propulsion system of BrahMos coming from Russia. And BrahMos II is not identical, Zircon and BrahMos 2 are same.
Those are both part of unknown project...
If someone provide the solution between
Subsonic, supersonic & hyper-sonic. I obviously choose hyper sonic AShM, why you think so many countries funding in hyper sonic flight regime? The answer is simple,
and by no chance Kalibr comparable to BrahMos is threat perspective. Thats why Indian...
But if someone ask me to take a hard decision, I prefer to dump BrahMos with its VLS, and instead install Barak 8 VLS there.
And I prefer 2 launchers of Kh-35. In Indian Navy, even the first frigate that going to be equipped with both BrahMos and Barak 8 will be P-17A.
Yes indeed, even if there is space for 2*8 Barak 8 on P28, this is useless without MF-STAR, that missile integrated with MF-STAR.
The only possibility is if there any add on mast with smaller MFSTAR in Israel that can go in P28.
There is no space for MF-STAR behind
I am assuming the height of VLS of 8 cells and 6 cells would be same.
Clearly on Kolkata class 8 cells VLS is installed.
Indeed, if Israel provide solution as add on mast with MF-STAR that equipped on Sa'ar 5, that not going to be a problem.
The diameter & length of missile doesnt matter, all matters is measurements of VLS, lets check some facts.
The above image is of Vishakapatnam Class displaying how much length needed for a BrahMos VLS.
And this image of under construction P28.
The BrahMos VLS also known as Universal...