Search results

Detection is not the problem, interception is. Radars exist in India that can track space objects out to 1,000km. https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/defenceupdate.in/with-multi-object-tracking-radar-india-can-track-pakistani-missile-and-space-debris/amp/ So entirety of LEO is covered. And the...

Some rocket scientists in this thread seem to be having the time of their lives talking about stuff they know nothing about. The altitude of intercept is a very variable thing, I'm pretty sure future tests will reach much farther heights. But the thing is, you need to have a decommissioned sat...

You'll have the proof when sanctions come down on Pakistan for using F-16s and AMRAAMs paid for by US against the terms specified by WOT FMS rules. Hint: Why do you think PAF was trying so hard to vehemently deny that any F-16 was used? ;)

So? That doesn't disprove that this missile was fired by PAF F-16. F-16 which your officials said was not involved in the incident at all. Are you blind I already posted an image of when this piece was taken to press briefing with Indian officers all around it:lol: Like I said, we brought...

India never claimed F-16 fell on its side of LoC. Actually it went like this - Pakistan: No F-16 was used, JF-17s were in fray India: (shows AMRAAM) Pakistan: ........

I don't know where it is common knowledge to think that one would integrate an American radar-guided missile with a Chinese fire control radar, without violating every single FMS rule they were purchased under. Not to mention its impossible unless Raytheon shares the source codes for...

On the missile? Sub-contract numbers are not written on the missile body. Only of the main production order (FA8675-05-C-0070) is written. On this missile or on any other AMRAAM. Here I kindly post pic of the mijjile - Now you will probably claim that we brought the missile from Taiwan on...

A lot of countries were sold missiles made under 0070 contract, the one sold to Taiwan was a sub-contract. There were other sub-contracts - Now what you want to say... :lol:

The engine components clearly belong to an F110 (used on TAI-upgraded F-16), looks nothing like MiG-21 engine - Missiles for Jordan were also manufactured under the same 0070 contract. Re-read the OP carefully. And those Jordanian AMRAAMs sold to PAF as a package along with ex-RJAF F16s...

The original contract included FMS to Jordan. The F-16 two-seater shot down was also ex-Jordanian. (F-16.net database confirms the aircraft number, as the number hand-written on the engine component corresponds with the aircraft ID number from back when it was still in Jordanian service, and we...

Now trying to pass off survivor from Aero India Surya Kiran aerobatic team crash as IAF captured pilot :lol::lol::lol::rofl::rofl: These guys have lost it... Here's the real video from Aero India area in Bangalore -

Video is of Mi-17 crash, picture is of Hawk jet trainer crash from 2015. :rofl::rofl: MIGs :rofl:

Now an image of Hawk jet trainer crash from 2015 being passed off as shot down by PAF :rofl::rofl: https://odishasuntimes.com/iaf-fighter-plane-crashes-in-odishas-mayurbhanj/ Tail number - A3492

That is statement of Pak FM

Media reports saying all IAF pilots accounted for. Guess Pak wanted to capture some civilian like Kulbushan Yadav and pass him off as IAF pilot :lol::lol:

Missiles do not penetrate sir ji...they come close and then proximity sensor sets off payload explosion. In short that's not how missile strike on aircraft looks.

Mi-17, not any MIG or any fixed-wing plane.

What you "have to show" is a photo of MIG-27 that crashed 2 years ago :rofl::rofl:

Did he come from the same MiG-27 that crashed in 2017 that you guys are trying to pass off as downed by PAF? :rofl:

Lol - pic of MiG-27 crash from 2017....gullible propaganda believers you guys are :lol::lol: https://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/already-short-of-planes-indian-air-force-suffered-11-major-fighter-jet-accidents-last-year-274885.html