Search results

Few observations on the Topic esp the Heading: 1. I doubt that a cabinet minister talks like a "rastey ka bhikhari". 2. If asking somebody to do/not to do something makes them bhikhari, then the whole pak establishment is a bhikhaari. Of course the tone wud change from "saar sarrrr" to "allah ke...

BHAI SAAB, achhaar bann jaegaa IQ ka ?

its same with regards to India, only the volume here is larger.

awesome game........ felt bad for the naseem guy....huge potential.

MUSK CAME, MUSK SAW, MUSK FLED.

lol....you guys have beardos and we have weirdos this side. good luck south asia

no takers for goodwill, i guess

godi media international

how on earth u chose canada over china to leave ur beloved pakistan

RIP

generalization: all indians bad.

what is the status of india's deal with rolls royce/ safran for the hyped up collaboration of making a new engine (to be used for AMCA) ?

awwwwww

its a no-brainer actually...russia wudnt want to start ww3 without a solid ally.

sanghis "ghayab" after left-liberals ate them. sometimes i wonder if liberals are "librandus", these sanghis are the "original" Mr. G-aandoos. sorry moderaters, u can take down this post, but it had to be said. no mention of "buddha" and his "no god" policy?

thanks china for returning the boy......

i thought when a country controls a part, thats the border. gilgit baltistan is controlled by pak n aksai chin is controlled by china. btw, pakistan claims the whole of kashmir. does claims mean anything unless u control the area? what is there to be surprised about. similarly arunachal is part...

seems like yesterday

i got some info from this https://thewire.in/diplomacy/unsc-china-objection-india-sanctions-committee . nothing says regarding india's "mischief", let alone any proof of such. any non indian sourse is also welcome.

thank you for this informative article. however, the bold part is more interesting. can you pls elaborate wrt the 1267 committee. it says china "tried". did china (or any nation), succed ? thanks.