Search results

The article is wrongly phrased. It means that converting this corridor to Semi HSR(150kmph) is difficult because of the curves.

Indeed. It is unfortunate that a rentier state like Pakistan exists as Afghans neighbour, Pakistan has tried its best to ensure that Afghan people live under the shadow of terrorism and warlordism. One hopes that Afghanistan becomes a stable and prosperous country soon. The good people of...

Pakistan military is directly responsible for raising the terrorists and making Pakistani population become jihad loving starting from General Zia. They are directly responsible for destroying their nation to promote their own agenda and personal glory.

Train contract/economic contract affects India positively much more than any missile contract would.

China is a military rival. Pakistan is a security threat, not a military rival. Pakistan's use of terrorists and terrorism to achieve state goals across South Asia have jeopardized the security and safety of hundreds of millions across South Asia.

The Constitution bars any retrospective acts on criminal law. Basically no law can be enacted post facto so as to increase the incarceration of any citizen of India. So no ordinance or law can change the outcome of this boy(now man) getting free.

What an unfortunate country Afghanistan is that their neighbour is Pakistan. Pakistan has spread terrorism in Afghanistan and practically destroyed the lives of the good people of Afghanistan. Pakistan sponsored and protected Taliban, an organization that they do not want in their own country...

Really unfortunate. But the law has to be followed. He was a Juvenile when he committed the crime.

Really keep these empty threats where they belong - the dustbin. Pakistan is as influential as Ghana is...which is to say close to nil. Pakistan's 'influence' extends as 'far' as Afghanistan which is barely a country at all.

Pakistan is the single biggest challenge to India in terms of security because of their terrorism jihad ways. Therefore, it is obvious that India will be obsessed. It would be foolish not to be.

President Kalam followed a foreign religion however was no foreigner. He: 1. neither considered himself descendant of a foreigner or affiliated to any foreigner 2. nor someone who valued one square inch of any arab land(including mecca) more than one square inch of his land - India. Most...

Yeah. Sure.

I cant disagree with your post. However the case is also that the Hindu mobs are doing it not for religion but for political/monetary gains. Which is why despite being the overwhelming majority, relatively there are fewer cases of physical violence against Muslims. In case of Muslims, mostly...

That will happen eventually. For that however there is a legislative road block that cannot be circumvented. The J&K assembly will have to pass the resolution to that effect first, then the Parliament will take it up. After that A370 will be abrogated. Ultimately, we will change the...

Weak nations cannot force strong nations to participate in anything. As always, India will decide what to talk and when. It does not matter to India (being a status quo power) whether or not the talks happen.

And yet, what is the point of words if they are not a precursor to action? And this is the crux of my wish. To move the average Hindu out of his/her self created bubble of inaction comforted by the intellectual justification of 'non-violence' and 'individuality'. And this is the key problem -...

How do you understand Hinduism like this? I ask this question because your understanding is exponentially more deep than the best of Pakistanis I have seen. For example, if they see a Hindu bowing in front of a rock or a cow, the best they can get is that it is literally a cow or a rock that is...

On this board, I want to gain new information, not to teach or give information to others. Multitude of Budhists. I have already asked you. Better talk to them. @Tshering22 is a Budhist. @Abingdonboy is a Sikh. Tons of us around.

My apology. My post was intended to be a discussion, not a flame war which wastes my time and other's. In your opinion which part of my post could be construed as being offensive, so that I can make my point better next time. On the issue of wahhabis and deobandis, I must tell you, despite the...

Come again? I just explained to you the difference between them and us. We have to be clinical and ruthless. 'They' have to have reactionaries like Dalit.