Search results

Nice, keep it up.

Well the power to weight ratio is only marginally better with 1 HP per ton with 24HP per ton for T-90S and 25 for Type 99. Upgraded Indian T-90S now have a home made fire control system along with a new gen French thermal sights. The T-90S has also lower weight due to home made lighter tank...

It cost 6 billion to build, you don't have that kind of money to build such things. Finance can be the biggest enemy for any military, you have to keep that in check.

Nothing an T-90S or Arjun Mk-2 can't handle. The Indian T-90 also has hard kill counter measures against anti tank missiles & rockets. If Leopard 2 and Abrams are rated over the Merkava Mk-4, then we can know how much this military observer knows. Merkava easily rates better with Trophy ATS...

FN SCAR will not be cheap even when made in Pak, let alone be available for licensed manufacture

:pakistan: damn, I have the Pakistani flag too, I must be Kashmiri. I wonder what happened to the 3 million erst while East Pakistani's who also waved Pakistani flags :pakistan: hmm....:raise: Kudh ka desh handle nahi hotha, duniya jeetne chaley.

Well your definition of super power is skewed to say the least. Russia/US/China/UK/ France/India are all super powers and have abilities to project power far away from their own countries. Countries like US/Russia are bigger super powers, China too is big enough super power with India catching...

India has no need to create more interdependency with Pak, it never should. CPEC benefits Pak and China. CPEC will ultimately benefit China as its their money.

Not entirely, India is already a super power, it is able to project power well beyond its borders, has strategic reach through nuclear missiles, has the largest volunteer army in world and the 4th largest airforce and has the fastest growing democratic market on the planet. Sure, at the moment...

Why does CPEC have any benefits to India, why would India invest billions into Pak, with no guarantee of returns. The Chinese can take such risks. India doesn't need trade with Pak. India has plenty in its own back yard to invest in.

And yet Pak has always been the aggressor, so much so that our retaliation is pretty much legally agreed upon world over, its Pak that ends up starting the fight and raising the white flag when the going gets tough. As for the wars, all this bull about tactical nukes is hogwash. Your nukes if it...

Regardless of the BS bravado, Pakistanis always end up raising the white flag and being forced to accept their bodies.

RAW is just too good for ya'll man :) problem is who even takes Pak (oops East China) seriously these days. Whatever RAW does, doesn't measure up to the mess-ups of ISI and PA. Between the mess-ups and the chaos thereof, RAW can continue to function freely.

I would be silly for the folks to think that India didn't have the spine, considering the MKIS and Mirages came into your territory, they might not have started anything but shows possibilities exist. As for the MKI being armed, 2 MKI carry missiles than all 5 opponents combined :crazy:. Also...

Same reason why your going off topic, losses of Indian soldiers during regular anti terror ops are in no way representative of losses during Kargil. As for your BS war on terror and this op is hogwash. Just Pak's attempt at saving face by bombing the tribal regions, while the real Taliban are...

Juan Carlos is the ideal LPD for the IN, they should order upto 6. These mini carriers are ideal. If this one is picked, you can sure the F-35B will be acquired for it. IN loves the STOLV aircraft, they love their Harriers and sure will love the F-35B. The F-35C might be acquired for INS Vishal.

Well over 6000 PA troops died without actually fighting a war on terror, what is your point here? Sure Kargil was an intelligence failure for India but that's India's problem. The so called partial war on terror that Pak fights, killing some militants while using others as strategic assets, the...

Well in a normal country it is common practice to quote the highest authority in the civil Govt. usually the elected leader of a nation, your statement only shows that Pak is a failed state since even their own people don't believe their elected leader.

There is no such as thing as invincibility, India was always too trusting and as always vacated the winter posts as they were far to harsh to maintain during Winters and Pak broke this trust as always. If anything we were naïve. India didn't mention the deaths, rather your own PM and other...

hahah it was your PM who ran shameless to the US to save his burning *** :rofl: