Search results

lol. come on mate. Accept the past reality of 60-70 years ago, those were Indian Muslims who wanted a separate country. Similarly, those who wanted to be separate in what is now Bangladesh were previously Pakistanis (and before that Indians). What's the big deal with that? hmm...

Of course, by Indian Muslims I mean Muslims in British India. Now those (or whose generations) now live in Pakistan or Bangladesh are very proud to be identified as Bangladeshi or Pakistani. Refering them as Indian to a Bangladeshi or a Pakistani would be causing a offense I suppose.

hahah ,, my usage of term Indian Muslims is causing you pain. Well, you admit or not,, but technically all of our (Pakistani, Bharat, Bangladesh) ancesters were Indians before we started fighting and keeping grudges against each other which led it to creation of eventually three states. And...

No, its not wrong. All Muslims who live in Pakistan now were previously Indians. They were a minority in British India. People in current geography of Pakistan opted for a separate country so they got it, many other Muslims from eastern states migrated to the newly created country. Or in other...

No, we are talking about the internal situation of Pakistan, i.e. after the creation of Pakistan. There was only one possibility that Pakistan would not have existed incase there was no rift between Muslims and Hindus in British India. There was enough hatred and problems that Muslims felt the...

You are dis-crediting the economy growth? The hell what you want,, you want a mess and down turn like now? your economy was growing at about 7% in 2006-2007,, what else you want? Goverment had money to spend on people,, like HEC spent money on poor students who couldnt afford a higher study at...

No, you are wrong. You dont want to look there because that will prove you wrong. They are not pro army points, this how one can measure a country's growth. Look at China, or Japan or any other progressing country, these indicators there are strong,, not because the army is in Power or not...

Now you are moving the discussion towards creation of Bangladesh and war on terror and fight against soviats. These are in themselves full fledge topics which can be discussed in next 50 pages, on which world have written books. However, if you would pick the right books, i am sure you will find...

Any naive can allow this, anybody loyel to the country will not and should not allow this to happen. If I am seeing the country is drowning and I have the power to save it, I will save it,, no matter what the world say or what a piece of paper written by fake degrees holder thugs (who bought...

if the rest of 98% are bent on destroying the country, and they do destroy it,, and army saves it at the end,, who is better then?

What, Pakistan destroyed tape stored in all india radio libraries? Dont you people keep your libraries under lock? If not, I am going to destroy all tapes lallu of parsad.. he is so annoying.

HM is militant in his mind.. If you read all of his columns and programs one thing would be common :- - Bashing Army for fighting war against suicide bombers, Al-Qaida, Taliban inside Pakistan He is even caught on phone while advising some militant to kill Khalid Khawaja, the abducted former...

I dont know why Pakistanis are scared of the name 'secular', at state level the country should be secular, i.e. neutral to all sects and religions. it is a personal choice of anybody to adopt any religion or any sect. This is the only way all sects and religions can live peacefully in one society.

’نہ رات کو نیند آتی ہے، نہ دن کو‘ ?BBC Urdu? - ????????? - ?’?? ??? ?? ???? ??? ??? ?? ?? ??‘? How wonderfull is that terrorizing...

There are news that Al-Qaida nr 2 was killed there,, perhaps it is the same strike? If so, then good. One more devil is no longer a threat to humanity.

Actually it is always easier to blame others,, admitting own fault is hard and takes guts. The Goverments don't admit it as it would be considered their failure.

I wonder if there would same outrage in Pakistan as of the Nato attack.. Unlikely that scums like Hamid Mir would even mentioned it in their 'daily barking'.

I am not pissed, but it sounds like being a typical Indian that half news is making your day. Anyway, majority of Pakistani public is against opening that route, so if they permanent arrange it from other side, it would just save Pakistani roads.

It doesn't mean in anyway that Pakistan isnt relevant in this conflict anymore or Pakistan has lost this card. It just means, they are creating another backup and trying to reduce dependency on Pakistan. Supply routes aside, West cannot solve Afghanistan without Pakistan.

correct, one must think above own ego, defend only what is justified and makes sense. This is called honesty and it gives credibility to one's opinion and character.