Search results

I have to call them a minority if there is no reason to believe otherwise.. As for anything coming out of majority normally there more than enough reasons to believe as i wrote above.

No politician is making any issue out of it .. it is just posted here on PDF. Majority who condemned Salman Taseers murder is silent and is not represented by anyone. It is difficult to say if that is really a majority or a is a scared small minority sitting in some corners of the country...

Politicians pick up issues that attact public, so is now a days Supreme Court, So are any visible forces in the country in form of a political party or any religious group. No one picked up this issue, is a proof that large public doesnt has much interest in it. I believe what you are saying...

But those who know that doing it was wrong,, are not anywhere visible in Pakistan expressing their outrage,, isnt it? At maximum I think one can get a very mild criticism of it,, like .. 'I dont agree with this' or 'God knows whose right'.

The man was burnt alive by a mob accusing him of blasphemy. This act will not spark any large outrage in Pakistan like Raymond Davis's case nor any suo moto notice nor dharna by any religious bs party nor outcry on Facebook among Pakistanis nor will even wake up ghairat birgade of Pakistan ...

The bs of posting pointless videos is started again... Mods, Are you taking a nap?

Reallly? Are you sure Nerendra Modi wanted to bring it under 'control' as soon as possible? You seem to disagree with other indians.

So you prove the point of thread infact. entire community of muslims is unhappy there so they started it.. right?

A suspected terrorist act of a mob means wiping out entire community? Why did Nerendra modi suprized a fair trail of those involved in the train incident instead of supervizing a masscre of Muslims, and their properties.

I will have to be a retard to believe Indian Goverment's account on Gujrat, whose state-terrorist/minister supervized masscre of over 2000 Muslims. Read again the wikipedia with your daft head if you can understand.

Now you are going to where we came from. Earlier you admitted that Indian Muslims are not doing well and discrimination is one of the reasons.

Biggest group non-Sunni group, Pakistani Shias are in Pakistan, many of them are infact better of than Sunnis. But betterment of Indian Muslims hasnt shown any significant progress in 70 years, rather some unfortunate things have happened there.

So now finally your intellect dictated you to resort to personal attacks in order to divert attention from the topic. 'intelligent' indeed!

Behaviours guided by Religious is a different thing. We are talking about here econmic and social condition of Muslims in India. I may agree with you that the Christians in Pakistan dont do well as the rest of population,,... if thats what you want to hear from me...but since the creation of...

Ohh no, we are just doing some hard cuddling. Isn't it dear Indians?

Here you come. I dont understand why it is so hard for people to admit a straight fact.

Ok, He might be a member of parliment. But a memeber of parliment's words dont have higher weight than the combined Indian Muslims facts, based on figures. Maybe another member of parliment would say something else.

Now you want to move the discussion from current fate of Indian Muslims, to pre-partition situation? Lets stick here first.

hahahah .. So those Muslims in Gujrat were looking for conflict, and they killed 250 Hindus.. to get their 2000 burned alive? Hilarious.

Somebody can merge this threat with that?