Search results

I had hard time putting up the theory for 700000 and you are increasing zeros :o: I barely justified that "7 lakh figure might have been the accidental application of 1=10 logic to Indian side." Means common now we need somebody else to come up with the logic 1=100 to make new theory :mad:

Let me be more clear. Then reply is you want. Facts: 1. India will not start a direct war. - simply not worth it. We have more to lose. 2. Pakistan will not start a direct war cause they can't win it. 3. India will not reply terror attack with full scale war. There are other means for it...

India does need Kashmir so does Pak. If not why isn't Pak asking the people from India side to move to Pak side ??? It's people you care about right ??? "How can a man die better, Facing the fierceful odds, For the temples of his Gods, And ashes of his forefathers" Nice poem. But I was thinking...

Your definition of strength might be alien to me. I am a realistic person. War is a closed option after WW2 and nukes. It simply isn't worth the loss. Fact: no 2 big powers fight a direct war. They use other means. So even if an Indian say we must attack Pak to get Kashmir I will say he is...

Try not putting your words as mine. Read again and understand or ask. Assumptions are not good for anybody

If I may reply, 1. Yes it's a fantasy to say either Ind or Pak accept LOC as IB but sarcastically it's rational that Ind or Pak will get the other part of Kashmir!!!!! Is it ???? 2. Right to self determination was option in early days. I hope you know who threw it to away 3. The best decision...

You can 100% be sure there WILL NOT be a full scale war on this issue. Cause nobody can win that. Govt and armies of both side are far more mature than members on PDF Kargil like situation is another option but you know the eventual result

So am I. It's just the difference in perspective. Do you ever wonder why rest of the world is silent on the issue. What you are calling a voilence is a standard SOP followed around the world. Protesters & their type/means of protest decide the reaction. For a sec just assume if this kind of...

The word "Assumption" is made of few interesting words. I hope you know them. If there was such a thing in my national conscious your would have surely knew it. Underestimating anybody never helped anybody. But I will say I like how you thnk. It's better for us that way

Let's say you are the one who can see in future and predict it. India is in possession of land and it's not letting it go. Then how are your "will"s going to happen. Plz explain I won't call it best. It's rational and realistic approach.

By nobody I mean ANY NATION. And I stand correct. Prove me wrong You , I or anybody here doesn't or can't influence the situation. We are just spectators.

If I may, Nobody cares about Kashmiris. Sad but reality. Strategic importance of that land is big problem in solving the problem. Right now only realistic solution for people in Kashmir is accept either India or Pak as their country and cross LOC. Kashmir as an INDEPENDENT NATION is never...

Add one more fact. Issue is about "Kashmir" part of an Indian state "Jammu & Kashmir". And which map show Nepal as a part of India ??? Your solution of opening borders will cause more problems than solving any. There is a reason why Pak is sealing its border with Afagan.

I doubt that Having good diplomatic relations isn't friendship. That's what I am too saying. I Maintaining good relations isn't friendship. It's where you stand in crisis Power flow by the barrel of the gun. USA already have almost all ME in pocket. Israel don't need PAK this is pure...

Let's forget all economy corner and just look strategic point of views. The writer, in his own opinions, forgot or overlook US-Israel relationship. That means Pak has to ditch China for that to happen !!! Nowhere near possibility. Israel for its own benifts won't support a country who is "a...

Read carefully the wonders of diplomacy. Pakistan can use such FM Now you know what it actually meant.

Are we comparing Apache and LCH now !!!!! Why in the world we need to compare everything we produce or will produce to something else. I am no expert but I will write something an expert told me few years ago - The attack chopper is supposed to do 200 times cost damage to enemy assists before...

So will the defender will have improved counter measures ??? Technology will improve for both. So none will out perform the other. Winner will always be the one who have more rounds to fire. So attacker always have adv if going against the sea base targets Firing Subsonic and supersonic...

Hiring a lobbiest is legal in USA. And most of time you hire friends of that country for lobbing. Nothing's wrong in it. So it is also a possibility

Again ??? Seriously!!!!!! That make her a friend of india but not an expert on Indian defence needs.