Search results

at least one of you admits it. he shouldnt have been elected in the first place though

the problem with modi is that he prevented some police from trying to stop the riots (not that he didnt provide enough security).

come on, they're still human, arent they? if muslims massacred thousands of hindus over a fire that was found to be accidental at first, and then later found to be by some locals hindus likely picked up and tortured off the street, i'd say it was very unfair.

yes, i find that a bit sick. after all the investigations and evidence that modi facilitated the murder of thousands of muslims, he got elected by popular vote in India. Most Indians support the mass killings of Muslims would be the conclusion here. very sick.

at least admit it was unfair to kill thousands of muslims regardless of how the fire started?

i was commenting on the article. It says when such incidents occur, the indian police locate local muslims, torture them to make them confess. possible that it happened with godhra? i would say likely as the first probe said it was an accidental fire that occurred.

what would your point be? it this is how you get muslims to admit to the train burnings, then it falls under my first point. you torture some local muslims, get them to admit guilt, and then thousands of indians massacre thousands of muslims. at least you could admit that is unfair?

so a bomb goes off, indian police grab some local muslims, torture them to make them confess and say muslims did it. it's only when purohits leave their fingerprints all over the crimescene that they dont. if the first occurs, thousands of muslims are killed, if the second occurs that's...

it's possible that pakistan is not the problem and the afghan taliban are an afghan movement. in which case invading waziristan is pointless. i dont see why you think a waziristan invasion is likely. i see it as very unlikely.

by that reason, the us should have invaded pakistan a year, 2 years, three years ago, if pakistan was the hurdle.perhaps it's not the hurdle, the us may know it?

what would be the point? once one bit of strategic depth goes, another one is created. if the americans leave what would be the point of destabilizing pakistan also?

India? It's not going to do anything. It will run off from Afghanistan as soon as the Americans leave. That's what it's always done isn't it?

I doubt the US would invade if they're leaving Afghanistan in a couple of years. wouldnt be any point.

Accepting India in any position is like allowing criminals to sit on juries since India is violating many of the UN's own resolutions.

Perhaps Iran could. Except noone launched the duqu attack on Iran. They launched it on Europe :cheesy:

So, according to your all seeing wise eye, the target of duqu is Iran even though it was launched to attack Europe. What happened? Did the creators of duqu accidentally press, send europe, by mistake? :rofl: you really do not sound much like your nickname by insisting iran is under...

Goodness me. Can't you read? YOUR ARTICLE SAYS THIS A little more than one year after the infrastructure-destroying Stuxnet worm was discovered on computer systems in Iran, a new piece of malware using some of the same techniques has been found infecting systems in Europe Duqu has not...

the duqu malware didnt have anything to do with Iran. read your article. A little more than one year after the infrastructure-destroying Stuxnet worm was discovered on computer systems in Iran, a new piece of malware using some of the same techniques has been found infecting systems in...

your title says Iran under attack by stuxnet variant. the text says Europe under attack or recon by stuxnet variant. iran can get someone else to write the anti virus so it wouldnt be a problem for them.

what makes you say that out of interest? weren't all non nordics the primary target?