Search results

Yes that number might be wrong it's 16 billion as membership fee. on top of the same they pay more for the military and let monetary losses for the unemployment of its own people.

This is over the top... How is this conspiracy? All is in open.

I guess this will be my last post ever if I contradicted with this

With all due respect, the words Islamic and republic don't get together.

As much as I agree with your remarks. I can't stop thinking about the existence of Pakistan as the same basis. Would you say that your founding fathers were wrong? Sorry if I put you in a position.

I didn't wanted to respond but just food for your thought how many each has been produced.

Don't act like Pakistan... You need to be consistent not opportunist.

I respect you as a person so please do not take the following personally. Your first statement is hilarious as this would be the first in history as French were trying to make something else and it ending up becoming that and air superiority fighter as well. This was the sole contest between...

Access to them is more important than procuring them. That's how you build soft power.

Your basis of this comment is the underlying fact that an air superiority fighter was the requirement. I would prove it otherwise. Find the expanded version of MMRCA. Doesn't it mention multirole. Also if that was the role then eurofighter should be the choice.

I don't agree with respect to your conclusions. 1. How? Maneuvering is not a parameter for air to ground missions. 2. I already mentione the number for Dassault offer. They can't lower it for you since it's almost the same as that of Egypt or Qatar. IAF can only get planes from full rate...

That too naked....

Well to be honest, if $220 million is not expensive then what is? F35 is doing the same role and more. I am not sure if this could be done or not but you guys should be doing f35. They are still cheaper than what French are offering and more input from IAF could certainly help. I don't need to...

I would rather say the former PM represented the spirit and tardiness. The current PM represent the ambitions and soft power of India. Definitely the current one pleasing to the global world as it represents the willingness and over reach to work with others. As for the NSG India's credentions...

Interestingly it brings the question of USA trusting Pakistan.

I have a very good understanding of the so called history since Pakistan is what not even 70 years in creation. Try me

Give me couple examples. Doesn't ring a bell.

Excused. We is the other user and myself. For the nations (explitly mentioned) I can't excuse you.

When backstabbing, deception and foolish behavior is the national character then God save the country or may be allah. Please enlighten us on why this is happening and how Pakistan got so called disrespected.

If we cannot agree on the problem it's no way both nations can agree on solution.