How India chooses to respond is upto them. Army establishment in this country has its citizens respect and belief. They have served the country well for 60+ years and haven't once given us a reason to mistrust them.
Perhaps its not the same in Pakistan which is why after every action from their...
Laughing is easy. refuting with facts isn't.
Guess which country has issues with both neighbours? Which initiated 3 wars? Which keeps harping on about using nuclear weapons? Which wants UN to intervene but not follow the very first step of UN resolution?
I don't expect a proper response...
For us this is nothing but a photo op stunt.
Why is it hard for you guys to simply understand that like you lap up everything ISPR tells you as gospel of truth.
We in India believe our COAS and we believe they destroyed terror launch pads. India has had a longstanding reputation as a peaceful...
"For 70 years, the water which belongs to India and the farmers of Haryana flowed to Pakistan. Modi will stop this water and bring to your houses," the Prime Minister said in an election meeting.
Modi has been planning on doing this for a while now - utilising India's share of water fully as...
Rinse and repeat.
India attacks terror camps in Pakistan. COAS denies.
They invite media to those spots. But don't give them proper access (remember balakot? https://in.mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idINKCN1QO26W)
Indians believe we bombed terror camps. Pakistanis believe their ISPR. Win...
How do I know he meant blacklist? because he used the word, exactly like I'm spelling it B-L-A-C-K-L-I-S-T.
Also at this point I am confused if you are genuinely unable to understand what he's saying or just pretending to ignore the fact.
Either way, you are free to believe what you want to...
He literally says further action which is they will be mentioned in the public statement also referred to as the "blacklist". Jeez
Now if you want to still deny it. Be my guest!
Unsubstantiated? The video is shared by the likes of Pakistani journalists. You don't like the news so you want me banned.
here,
It's not my interpretation, it's what president of FATF has said. Now you are free to take it however you want.
You are free to search his interview it is on video and he said clearly that next action would be to include Pakistan in the statement which effectively means blacklisting. His words, go and argue with him.
I think that was obvious.
Another update is the President of FATF who's from China categorically warning that if all conditions aren't met by Feb, it will result in blacklisting.
China bit more than it could chew tbh.
They should've laid a bit low till obor was completed before they tried to piss off Europe and US.
Now they are heavily invested in various countries to revive the old trade route but have Hong Kong problem to deal with and relentless assault from Trump...
you are struggling for context though. One guy says PAF should shoot down civilian planes. My response is to him and you quote me out of context.
I know this for a fact that PAF won't do such thing because they wouldn't want to risk the ire of the world and a war with India.
I guess I got...
I like this bravado. But they didn't do anything while India swiftly Integrated Kashmir. You think PAF will risk nuclear war by shooting down an Indian civilian plane?
Heinous? No. But undemocratic yes. But sometimes some situation calls for such moves. If BJP had announced removal of article 370 and not enforced such strict rules, It would have presented a perfect opportunity for Pakistan to fuel Separatist to create violence and then Imran would have gone...