Search results

Because Ayodhya is sacred to Hindus as mentioned in Ramayana. That site is considered to be birthplace of Ram. Hindus want it to have a temple commemorating that. Muslims get a land to build mosque inside of Ayodhya. India was invaded by Mughals, temples were destroyed, mosques were built...

It is a win-win for both parties. There will be a mosque and a temple built. It is just that the disputed land will be where the temple will be built.

The ban was because domestic demand > production. So exporting it would have meant inflating of prices domestically due to less quantity. I know it's fun for you to troll in the name of India but it wouldn't hurt to get your facts straight first. Bangladesh know why India stopped exports.

Hindus get to build temple on disputed land. Muslims to get 5 acres of land to build mosque. A win-win scenario. Obviously this will be spun as a defeat for Muslims to create rifts within the community from external players.

Wait so passport is required or not? As I understand there was a MoU signed between both sides that had passport as a requirement. Imran later waived that requirement as a gesture of goodwill. But was that gesture translated into writing? In my opinion it wasn't or probably the idea was not...

Note sure Tencent and Bytedance (tiktkok) will be too happy with this news.

It's great to see people are calling him out. Oh my, this guy is in different universe isn't he?

There is merit to this idea but I think the timing of this couldn't have been worse. India is going through its worst phase in economic terms and such a move would kill any confidence left in domestic industry. But if Indian sectors have to up their game, they need get out of their comfort...

That sounds hollow and sham of an excuse. You say he is a traitor, foreign agent. How does politics come into all this. If he's a threat to nations security, arrest him. Why has imran not done it? You guys mock Sheikh Hasina for killing her opponents who openly voice their dissent against her...

If a) facts are speaking themselves and b) he's doing undemocratic actions. Whats stopping police from arresting him and punishing him as per the court of law? If he isn't doing anything wrong, then you shouldn't call for his execution so openly. I doubt if you even understand the seriousness...

The obvious lie that this occurred in LOC when in fact it didnt. As for you rejoicing Indian soldiers death, you are free to do that. I don't think it matters to us, it just says more about you as a person

Prove him as foreign agent in court of law and punish him as per law. Calls for execution is again not what a democracy loving person would advocate.

I don't know what gave away this secret? Sarcasm aside. Indian politicians said in the lower house, just few days after August 5th that they will try to get Gilgit Baltistan and Azad Kashmir. Initiating war or aggression first from our side has never been our way, so it will have to be...

So you want to do what India did with Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh but continue to oppose India's move? You know if you do that you just end up legitimizing our move and we'll be close to the current situation being status quo.

Strange that you want the opponents of Imran Khan's government to be killed. Democracy allows for dissent.

or maybe he is just pointing out an obvious lie in the tweet that this thread is based on?

you really need to get out of weird part of internet and spend more time travelling to places to get real idea about them. But you know better obviously.

I'm sure you living in Pakistan (or other country) know more about ground realities in India than me, who actually lives here.

If it's hijacked why lose 3 state elections?

And how is that relevant to what I posted? What India did in IJK was bilateral dispute between India and Pakistan. Yet Pakistan went to China and they used their power to call a urgent hearing. I don't see China running to UN to call an urgent hearing for Palestine. They clearly did because...