Of course.
Who fights wars without expecting damages and losses.
The cost for Pakistan would probably be much more.
As I said. No price is too much for defense of the nation.
It makes no practical difference to India whether there are bad relations with Pakistan or good relations.
Our priorities are elsewhere and much greater. A single GST law enactment would lead to billions of dollars of investment and trade, much more than the entire trade between India and...
There would probably be revolution in India if that happens and Maoists would gain power.
India is a decent enough manufacturing country (coming in the tier 3 manufacturing level though in top 10 globally) and very high in Services, and yet there is still a massive issue politically on...
You are grossly mistaken if you think our nuclear weapons are intended or preserved because of Pakistan.
Or that Pakistan giving up nuclear weapons would mean India is comfortable in giving them up too. Or that an Indian-Pakistan disarmament treaty is in any way a possibility because our...
At least your country has warehouses.
In India, the construction/capacity of warehouses has been left far behind by production of wheat and grains. Around 30% of our entire production is stored in the open and rots away much earlier because there is no storage capacity.
You missed the point.
The idea of US was not to stop the work, it was to delay it. Even US knows it cannot permanently stop a technology from developing.
That gave US time to incubate US based space launch companies which are doing great stuff. Had we done GSLV one decade back, we would have...