Well there we have it, you finally admit that what you are saying is your OPINION and that it ISN'T fact. Opinion does not = Fact.
About time. We can now move on.
LOL. You still aren't getting it, here i'll put it plain and simple for you.
You posted this link = Invasion of Iraq was driven by oil, says Greenspan | World news | The Guardian
It is saying Alan Greenspan THINKS the Invasion of Iraq was driven by oil, which is an OPINION.
Hence the title...
LOL. You don't even read your own links.
They are opinion pieces, not news reports. Please learn the difference.
Another comedy act from you is linking to a Pro-Socialist/Pro-Communist website opinion piece as "evidence"
This is hilarious!
No i didn't. I never once mentioned Islam nor does Islam have anything to do with my simple request of another source for this story that is in English and Isn't Iranian.
Because it often reports completely fake news stories......
It's illegal to completely invent news stories that didn't...
Hold up, I'm going to post a couple of times and then i'm going to link you to random, untrustworthy opinion blog posts which backs up what i say, whilst proving no real source or evidence.
following exactly how you do it:rolleyes:
Those are 3 news sources out of about 10,000 and those you mentioned have never created fake news tories. Anyway, I'm going to get into this big debate.
It's not hard to provide a non Iranian source, unless the story is fake of course.
PressTV is well recorded as to reporting fake news stories whether it be fake natural disasters to fake invasions. It's not a huge ask to be provided with a source that isn't Iranian. Surely if the report is true, there would be another source in the world that is reporting it?
It's not even a big deal, this kind of thing happens all the time. I was simply asking for some non iranian sources in English, considering Iranian state media ie PRessTV has a habit of cooking up fake stories, no matter how small or insignificant they may be.
I'm not the one making absurd and ridiculous claims and backing them up with random, untrustworthy opinion blog posts, so i have nothing to prove.
Anyone can tell simply by looking at what you wrote that you are simply a nutcase and what you are saying is BS. It's laughable that you think you...
Yeh, i'm trolling by calling you out on your pathetic and ridiculous conspiracy theories and your attempt at proving them by linking to blog posts.
Right......... :disagree:
Anyway thanks for hijacking the thread with you crap and ruining the discussion of the actual topic.
Moving on now.
Oh wow the proof of your conspiracy is overwhelming! A link to an opinion blog post from an environmentalist group is concrete evidence LOL.
You are hilarious, keep them coming :omghaha:
When you make such ridiculous, retarded claims like "The U.S invaded Iraq so oil would be traded in USD"...
I did no such thing. I already shut down your ridiculous conspiracy theories. Any person looking at them can tell they are stupid and untrue.
"The U.S invaded Iraq so oil would be traded in USD" LOL. What a laugh. :omghaha:
How embarrassing for you.
Nothing you posted furthers any of you stupid conspiracy theories, and hwat you have just posted is absolutely laughable.
My favourite one is where you are claiming that NATO now controls Libyas oil reserves because they provided air support to rebels. My second one is where you claim the U.S...
Nope.
That's one of MANY reasons, the invasion wasn't based on that.
Ah yes, this old stupid chest nut that is absolutely ridiculous. The U.S doesn't control Iraqs oilfields nor is Iraq a big exporter of oil to the U.S.
Another retarded conspiracy theory devoid of any fact or evidence...