We have heavy attack helicopter project. we changed he's design he is more better than now.
Also we have own atak project he will fly in this year, as you know atak is a licenced product in the base etc.
in 26:00 T-629 İtar Free T-129 Atak/ Atak 2 is Revealed by temel kotil.
I hope it would be like that .
Also there is new Heavy Class Attack Helicopter.
When we hear first time g-40 his stated. Siper G-40 missile. What's meaning of "G" on his name ? I think GÖVDE (body). So it reffer first stage of siper.
Bro's Are yours think about İ class AAW version ?
We can increase his vls's 16 to 32 and change mar-d x band behalf of smart-s space for same like a çafrad çfr x band role and one teirs plate to behalf of back fire control radar for çafrad umr s band role on the vertical position like that...
Essm is a point defence missile which evolved by sea sparrow. But G-40 is a more like Medium range air defence missile like 9M317M missile on russian ships. But yes usage aim and range are same with essm. G-40 like a Aster-15 missile but long ranged version . His long range coming from g-40 base...
Yes you right bro but genesis + akr-d block 2 or sting eo mk2 + smart-s mk2 enouh for him I think. So he need be fcs change and battle managment update.
Smart-s same class with herakles on freems. Herakles can operate aster-30 ofcourse smart-s can do it same .
Yes 8x mark-41 can be used in the future for 8 siper if navy accept 32 sm-1 missile for medium range air defence behalf of essm. they would be great support air defence ships to barbaros...
What if siper can launcable from mk-13 launcher of gabya's ? Main radar, fire control radar and battle managment system is enough to launch and operate him.
Using ukranien engine from a joint venture by baykar meaning low cost. Bayraktar tb-2 very costeffective price/performance vehicle also I'm thinking akıncı of course more costly vehicle than bayraktar but he will be costeffective when compared his same level ucavs. His cost will be nothing much...
Using ukranien engine from a joint venture by baykar meaning low cost. Bayraktar tb-2 very costeffective price/performance vehicle also I'm thinking akıncı of course more costly vehicle than bayraktar but he will be costeffective when compared his same level ucavs. His cost will be nothing much...
They can be sea skimming (maybe not sea skimming but) also he can travel around 40.000 feet. His altitude higher than essm and aster-15. Also he really small and stealth like missile not a valuvable target for long range air defence's. we can easily shot with him fac's, corvettes, frigates etc...
I think Jet powered and radar guided 100+ km ranged kuzgun-100 (front one) will be good game changer for us. He can be good high subsonic anti ship missile.
İf he fly around 40.000 feet and dive to ship in terminal phase it will be real dangerous . Also he is cost effective and have swarm...
There is a 2 latest rumor ı heard on twitter and facebook ;
First one is ;
Turkey will take 16 harrier II+ from italy for anadolu lhd . From my side if that's cheap and navy usses hims for gap-filler until carrier based stealth aa capable ucav's its ok.
Second İs ;
Turkey...