Search results

No, but most Gujaratis I've seen don't look THAT dark.

Those terms are used to refer to skull types, not genetics.

I'm just hammering the point home even further, so people like @Musalman get the memo.

I only suggested such a term because the word "Aryan" has historically been used by Indics to refer to nobility. You seem to have forgotten about all the Awans, Arains, Syeds, Qureshis and people with Dardic, Baloch or Pashtun ancestry who inhabit the Punjab and Sindh. These guys make up the...

:D I knew that would get something out of you.

I didn't know Gujaratis were so dark.

Never heard of that before.

Arabian Gulf.

As a wise man once said, "They hate us cause they ain't us". Probably a branch of Khazars.

It's funny how only the Indians seem to see this. Must be another case of you guys stroking your ego to cope with Muslims permanently shattering your Akhand Bharat.

The problem with that is South Asia also includes Afghanistan and western Pakistan. A better neutral term would be Aryanistan, which could refer to all Indic populated areas, and Dravidian populated areas can get their own name. That is true, it does a little murky, but I'm going by...

Another one: F-16s They are touted as some of the best dogfighters in service, even coming out on top of Eurofighters and F-35s during training exercises. They also have a very potent BVR capability and can be continuously upgraded, with the latest batch in service with the UAE military...

Muqarrab Khan also fought alongside Ahmed Shah Durrani, as did other Gakhar tribals of Potohar: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YCMeAAAAIAAJ&q=Muqarrab+Khan+Ahmed+Shah+Durrani&dq=Muqarrab+Khan+Ahmed+Shah+Durrani&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi29MXItcrfAhXiVhUIHWiTBOkQ6AEILTAB

This is a curious little fact I managed to stumble across. It turns out that geographically, most of Pakistan isn't a part of the Indian sub-continent. How? Let me explain: Most of us know that the Indus river has been the traditional western boundary of the Indian sub-continent, and that this...

Those emerged long after and are not sufficient to explain the spread of culture. Mass migration is the only way such a significant influence could occur.

Obviously there wouldn't be any Vedic culture in the Caucasus. That's not what I said, I clearly said Vedic culture is derived from theirs. The evidence for this plentiful, there are too many similarities between different Indo-European languages and cultures. Unless you have another mechanism...

Long story short: The Ghaznavids founded modern Lahore and used it as their winter capital. That makes it about 1000 years old. And Indians still think the Ghaznavids are foreign to Pakistan. Smh.

Don't forget that we sent rockets to space long before you did.

@Dubious @waz @Slav Defence @DavidSling I think it would be more appropriate for the title to say "Israeli" rather than "Jew" because that appears to be the main issue rather than the religion of the people who were purchasing the property.

He's right to some extent.