Search results

Maybe, but it's impossible to say for certain.

@Fortress Still think we have a race problem?

Living and intermarrying with Hindus for hundreds of years would do that to anyone.

He was a switcher. Born Ismaili, converted to Twelverism, and finally settled on Sunnism. But throughout his life, he acted like he was non-denominational. Not necessarily. Sindh itself was the original gateway for Islam into the region, and Lahore has always been a seat of Islamic power in...

Fair point. It does have a rich history from both Aryan civilisations, and this is reflected by it's population (split between Iranics and Indics). Pretty much lol. They not only have Dravidian in them, but also Arab.

Why Peshawar lol? You can check the Harappa sheet I posted earlier and find the Parsis in it.

There are even Indians in Karachi, I kid you not. And I'm not talking about people from the partition.

It's actually bewildering how you can say that without realising how stupid you sound.

We didn't tuck our tail, we've permanently carved out a massive chunk of land that could of been theirs post-British colonialism if it weren't for us. We went down with the last laugh. Muslims that far away should have fought for their independence if they couldn't make it. We can't carry...

I understand what you're trying to say, that's never been an issue. I'm just a little sceptical of the whole idea.

We do. We are Muslims who inhabit the Indus. That's our identity, plain and simple.

You're just repeating the same points without actually proving them, in spite of the evidence I have given which contradicts them. We have the largest population of Afghans in the entire world (the word Afghan has historically been an ethnonym for Pashtuns), we've got Hazaras who are...

Agreed, the Indus River has always been the cut-off between the Iranics and the Indics. However, the Iranics and Indics living close to this boundary are similar in many ways. The amount of Iranic ancestry among Punjabis and Dardics is far higher than with other Indics, and the amount of Indic...

Then what does? Lahore was one of his largest cities, his empire recruited many soldiers from Pakistan, his family assimilated into the Pashtuns (Pakistan's 2nd largest ethnic group), and Pakistan exists because of these Muslim conquerors. Are you expecting him to have a NADRA card or something?

The idea of Pakistan predates their involvement. Nah, they'd probably want to split from you over some stupid language controversy like they did with us.

You do since you're making a fuss over it. Ghazni and Lahore both acted as his capitals on rotation throughout the year (Lahore in the colder months, Ghazni in the warmer ones). Pakistan itself only came into being in 1947. Our heroes from prior to that time would be the Muslim empires of...

1. Pakistan exists because of Muhammad Bin Qasim (first Muslim to take control of large portions of the region), Ahmed Khan (first person to envision the idea of Pakistan), Rehmat Ali (coined the word Pakistan and created the "Now or never" pamphlet), and Jinnah (executed the strategy to create...

Yes we did, you can put whatever spin on it you want but at the end of the day we both know what the facts are, and that's why your nation still cries about 1971 decades later.

I'm not going to get into semantics since my comment was purely retaliatory in nature, but if you insist then I suggest you read up about how Islam views separatism based on ethnic identity and how many of those killed from 1971 actually came from Muslim backgrounds.

You're too stupid to notice, so just forget about it. Durrani and Ghauri were both Pashtun, and Ghaznavi's descendants are also Pashtun. All of three of them also had major cities in Pakistan (Peshawar was Durrani's winter capital, and Lahore held the same purpose for Ghaznavi and Ghauri)...