Search results

Mate, a REFUGEE seeking protection is NOT THE SAME as a person seeking refugee status (eg Asylum seeker) If a person cannot even determined to be a refugee, then where is the purposed threat for him, thus where is the refoulment? A person is seeking to apply for refugee status is not A refugee...

The question is what does it mean by transit is not based on the term transits, that's basically what is amount to the word transit? Now let's take a look of how an refugee can apply for a refugee visa to Australia? There are only 2 ways. You either apply in person in any of the Australian...

The 1951 convention only works for refugee, not the person who seeking the refugee. So, as i said, the Article 31 is after the fact that the person cannot be punished for the illegal entry after his successful claim of the refugee status. There are no articel in 1951 convention and 1967...

One cannot enter a country indirectly under the 1951 convention. The not liable to punish clause only support a refugee when they enter "Directly" from the land of original threat to their destination. Say if they travel from Sri Lanka to Indonesia then to Germany or Asutralia, the border can...

I am surprised to see many people actually do not know clearly regarding the 1951 conventions, people both side here arguing based on truth they think that's what that mean and argue with the "assumed" facts. I am all for argument but if you do, you should know the actual term before starting an...

Wasn't this is the same thing the Chinese fifty cents army allegedly been doing? Going on the internet and spread disinformation ? Maybe the 50 cents army is actually working for CIA andMossad

Iraq would never probably sided with Iran unless there are a common goal, that common goal in 2002 is America The reason why Iraq will never side with Iran is the same reason why China will never side with Japan. Those two belong to a different faction of the same religion. One the American is...

Something I do not really understand. Why you and that Chinese member only keep focus on the initial blast and only count them as a total destruction? Actualoy I would agree with you, if you try to literally complete destroy big city like shanghai via initial blast, you actually would have...

I remember my time in Kosovo as a Norbat rep to KFOR, the equipment back then is very dreadful. Most of the designator are not even weather proof back then... When soldier on the ground calling out target to pilot up there, they would have to call out the constant movement of the enemy so the...

Flag is made to respect, what do you think if some one start making Indian flag and advertise on internet solely "for burning"? I hope you are just joking.

Well, if you had studied European History extensively, you would know American record of betrayal is just peanuts to the big name like French, Britain and Russia, Russian betray 4 country in a span of 4 years during 1810, first they betray the Brits and sided with French, then they betray...

Victoria is not a province in Australia, it's a State

Tell me which country have not ever turn around and stab other in the back? Ask the French, they got turn around and stab by the Russian Empire during Napoleon era Ask the Pole, they got turn around and stab by USSR during WW2 Ask the Vietnamese, they got turn around and stab by the Chinese...

The article is a bit misleading, China indeed pay for the oil drilling in Iraq, but they are using American equipment and American technology Many people see American invade Iraq is because of its vast oil, in fact, it is and it isn't. It is for the oil, but not they want it for America, but...

You probably misunderstood the use of Air Defence Identification zone set by the US government Under the Civil Aviation Act, the Area under ADIZ does not count as a restrictive airspace, it can if that is an restrictive air corridor, but it could also be an commercial air corridor The US set...

I did not say the estimation is not accurate, I am not talking about initial blast radius at all, I am talking about damage done by nuclear device, initial blast is only one part of the equation Also the Tsar bomb is an air burst, which is not as destructive as ground det

You do realise you are talking about blast radius while I am talking about damage dobe, right? What I said damage and destruction is not merely from the initial blast, but also the fallout damage and damage from fire strom bOtH Nagasaki and hiroshima, the initial damage done is about 10-15...

Well you cannot make an estimation of explosion just by putting a circle and expect that is where the destruction ends Nuclear damage is based upon many different factors, you have your initial blast, then fall out and finally environmental factor on the ground Blast radius does not calculate...

I never say completely destroy, I said destroyed, each nuclear weapon can only damage a certain percentage of a city, even if china nuke Big City like London or Paris like 10 to 20 times, the city would still not completely destroy and there would still be survivor, especially in France because...

So the 10%, 50% and 90% is not a supported figure but just a random number from you. Even then you made a few serious mistake 1.) French sub launch SLBM (TNO) have a yield of 150Kt, not 100 as you suggested. And it was only a part of the nuclear weapon family, they also have TN-81, air launch...