Search results

Fact is unlike the IRGC, Artesh has to spend a much larger portion of its current budget on maintaining it's current platforms and because Iran has 2 military forces their (Artesh) budget is comparatively limited which makes it rather difficult and complicated for them to take on larger more...

No it does not indicate that the capacity is 400 BM. However, the figure does indicate that the retaliatory strategy and the tactic they planed on using revolved around that number of missiles being fired, which in my opinion is a strategic mistake and falls well short of what Iran would need to...

Again, Iran's attack even though limited was demoralizing because it came as a shock to the psyche of the U.S. troops on the ground who had neither seen nor expected nor even known or herd of other US soldiers ever witnessing something like that. American soldiers az koh pambeh sokhteh nashodan...

While missiles continue to fall, no, but Iran doesn't have an unlimited number of missiles nor will Iran have an unlimited amount of time to fire it's missiles before they are eventually targeted. In a conflict with the U.S. Iran would either have to use it's missiles in sufficient quantities...

Clearly Iran had no intention of causing max casualties or even inflict max damage against US assets. The main goal very clearly was to show U.S. leadership Iranian Missile capabilities so they don't miss calculate on what the result of a direct conflict with Iran would look like. That said...

I don't think you truly appreciate what an impressive number 11 of 16 (Near 70% success rate) truly is! Even with subsonic cruise missiles, it may not have been a great number but it would have been more than acceptable! For a solid fuel missile where the entire body of the rocket heats up to...

According to them 11 of 16 hit exactly where they were meant too. That's almost a 70% success rate which is a pretty high number for solid fuel BM's of that class especially fired is such limited quantities. It also shows how a sensor network could potentially save your assets from an...

A fighter program isn't just about a fighter! The requirements for manned Aircrafts isn't going away and you can't point to a single country on the planet that is capable of producing a viable airliner with engines and all but has yet to master the ability to produce it's own fighters! It's...

Not straw manning you azeezam we are just talking..... The U.S. may not view BM as a viable conventional solution due to their vast requirements but that doesn't mean they don't have them. And how we categorize Hypersonic is much different than they way they categories them. And you know that...

Not to mention the weight requirement of the missile, it's launcher,... If you think hitting a mobile launcher is hard, just imagine how hard hitting airborne targets will be over extended ranges to make up for a lack of an Airforce They do not have a feasible none Aircraft counter that...

Very nice! However, still in the same class as the CAIG Wing Long & MQ-1 CAIG Wing Loong - Wikipedia It clearly does not have big enough engines to be in the MQ-9 class meaning it does not seem to have a Turboprop engine.... If Iran isn't already in the process of producing a good turboprop...

Unless every aspect and every aspect ratio of your missile is fixed and uses the same type of tech there would be no weight per range fixed number! Above the atmosphere the only thing that keeps you up is speed! And Iran can build a single stage missile 2 times the size of the Zoljanah and it's...

The decision of LACM over BM for the US navy was made in the 80's and given the accuracy of BM and weight requirements compared to range on top of safety issues it was a rather sound decision. Even if you create a bridgehead somewhere near enough to an enemy territory you wish to invade, how...

Just compare the spec's Diameter, length.... It's the 3 stages and light payload that allows it to travel that distance...

Fact is if the Americans had overall chosen BM instead of an Airforce & LACM as their main conventional delivery system they would not have been able to invade any country outside their own continent. How are you gonna defend your Transport Aircraft, Your Helo's, Your Ships, Your armored...

Sina-1 is correct about the comments that have been made, however, it's rather obvious that the low RCS outcome was more a byproduct and happy accident of the designers attempt to build a high glide, comparatively low drag aircraft with the goal of achieving higher cruise speeds to extend the...

(2) Iran Esfarayen Steel Complex: producing gigantic rotor shaft ایران فولاد اسفراین: تولید شفت روتور - YouTube

Hatta bara Iran-Kashan motor Hyundai yani yeh motor as keshvaron mote'ahheadeh blook gharb entkhab shood! Iran Kashan container ship – ISOICO Moshkel e peeshron sarreh entekhabot masouleen khodmooneh! Vaghti as Faranseh o Koreh jonobi motor mekhareen behtareh montazereh avagheb tahreem ha...

Yea cause Iran has never been able to build and provide propulsion for a ship heavier than the Sahand! Honestly how hard is it for you to think a little? And the idea that you are somehow privy to every purchase and transfer of every part and component to and from Iran is without a doubt...

In terms of propulsion systems the difficulties relate back to the fact that Iran chose a western design to reverse engineer and required western components that would match. However, for a domestic design they would naturally have to purchase the propulsion systems before hand to be able to...