Search results

Infrared sensor basic https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandavionics.wordpress.com/2017/02/22/electro-optical-systems/

i understand it clearly, it you who keep making up nonsense to support your agenda that rafale is some sort of god like machine say what? where exactly does it say Spectra can adapt and develop a jamming profile that suitable to the threat that isn't in its library? every single one with...

you still dont understand as usual, the capability to record signal to build a library isnot something new, ISR assets do that all the time, it is completely different from what the new adaptive jamming here can do, which is developing a jamming profile that is most suitable to the current...

That is literally the definition of DRFM, it records unknown signal to use it immediately. But that is not the same as ability to recognize signal that isn't in threat library. Nevertheless that is completely different from what described by DARPA “We’re using artificial intelligence to learn...

So how is Spectra is any difference ? if it isnot recognized the signal as radar signal then there will be no jamming automatically, same as any other jammers it the signal is jittered and change frequency randomly then how can you know it is a threat? it would be pretty much like back ground...

As long as the frequency is within the limit of Jammer frequency coverage ( normally the limit of it's TWT and receiver )then it can produce a fake replica signal even if doesnt recognize the signal as a threat radar within it's library ( this is true even for repeater jammer , and obviously...

what you said is absolutely nonsense as usual. A DRFM system is designed to digitize an incoming RF input signal at a frequency andbandwidth necessary to adequately represent the signal, then reconstruct that RF signal when required. The most significant aspect of DRFM is that as a digital...

How is that any difference from ALQ-187(v)2 , ALQ-131 EA PUP , Falcon edge , ALQ-211(V)9 , ALQ-214(V)3 , Spectra , ASQ-239 DRFM isnot operate manually DRFM is common even on tactical fighter jammer : ALQ-187(v)2 , ALQ-131 EA PUP , Falcon edge , ALQ-211(V)9 , ALQ-214(V)3 , Spectra , ASQ-239

What make you think the French have been doing that for decades? if you are referring to DRFM then many USA system have that too, and that is nothing new

:cheers: good decision, it best to just ignore him like Gambit did, no point trying to teach him anything, he is not willing to learn at all, and he doesn't have a knowledge base on the matter so anything you try to teach him will only sounds like alien language :p: (i still cant get over...

No it isnt , while they both take advantage of entanglement , the working principle is completely different like engineer guy said read what they wrote carefully , it is not the same as your theoretical quantum radar You need to entangle exactly the number of wave-particle that you will...

Dude read carefully, do you understand what they said ? : Not a chance , this thing is even more theoretical than the warp drive , imagine observing the spin of not one but every single particle good luck with that

https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandavionics.wordpress.com/2016/04/12/radar-electronic-countermeasure/ https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandavionics.wordpress.com/

I couldnt care less if he posted his picture or someone picture online or that he posted pic from his vacation, did he posted him sitting in Rafale cockpit with paper showing his name ? No , did he posted him in an anechoic chamber with a paper showing his name ? No. like engineer guy said he is...

Oh funny how it came from Picdelamirand-oil too , isnt that also the guy who claimed to be an expert but actually thought the different between AESA and PESA is that the word passive in PESA stand for staying silent and only listening ? :lol: Btw , how is that video any different from Russian...

no they didnt , it just that you have very bad understanding of physics

These links will give you information to answer to own question https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandavionics.wordpress.com/ http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=25735 http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=16457

Dude , you should stop talking nonsense , this is getting ridiculous

But the ECM signal can have different delay , or doppler shift from real reflection to help break radar lock , or it could be white noise from a third party such as MALD-J or EA-18G , in that case shouldnt lower RCS help ?

No offense , i dont think you understand what you talking about at all According to the simulation Mig-29 frontal RCS is around 1 m2 while the value for F-16 is around 10 m2 that is 50% detection range as far as i know. Another point is : if both F-16 and Mig-29 was cruising at mach 1 , they...