Search results

Yes and thats right thing to do. Just numbers should not mean a lot. What we need is good living standards for everyone on earth. (not just for Indian. Chinese or US). We put lot of focus on these monetary aspects (which they do not deserve). This shows we are lacking in ourselves. The basis...

Best way to Eliminate terror camps across border. IA enters into Pakistan part of Kashmir, PA throws nukes (which IA counter with ABM), but importantly IA also throws its own Tactical Nukes on terror camps. :rofl: :D All Nukes fall either on terror camps or inside Pak. IA then withdraw from...

The growth should be even for all Humans on earth bar some regional differences. India need not beat China at anything. India needs to grow at good speed and provide good life to Indians.

India would have laser based ABM by 2030-35 for both tactical and strategic nukes. we will teach a lesson to PA, asap our ABM is ready. :P Till then enjoy. :D Yes thats interesting. IA will enter all major Pak. cities. Pak nukes all of them. IA comes back. lol what just happened. Pak nuked...

Even if the state provides for everyone, a constitution based on one particular religion is discriminatory. So as you said many laws are discriminatory (not all but many). This is not a nation in which I would want to live if possible for me. My point is if I can move to a country where I would...

Bro there is no disappropriate response. I think Pak rangers and BSF are testing each other out. On our side, BSF earlier did not retaliate due to congress timid nature. I don't think any side is pushing for war here. Just playing some mind games. I think after few days, there will be a reset...

Not disproportionate. But equal response is required. Earlier the congress did not even respond. So that is why compared to previous situation, the response is looking disproportionate to some people. It is not, but something that should have been done by congress also. Not responding only made...

Its good. I am fine if Pak. society takes out Aziz earlier, and then later remove Hafiz Sayeed. Taking on all jihadis at same time might be tough. But Hafiz needs to be eliminated from society eventually - if not today, then tomorrow. A secular Pakistan will have no place for hafiz and his Jihadis.

Retaliate to provocations on border. Nothing wrong. Informing that attack was spoiled. Nothing wrong. Congress objected and it has lost total credibility. they tried to make politics of this situation. Congress is a terribly shameful party. Not speaking till it abandons terror. I don't think...

I hope the purpose is to attack extremism. If these courts attack only bad terrorists, and allow good terrorists to do their business as usual, then extremism will continue to grow. If this happens these courts are already a failed policy. In my view I think being army sponsored, they are...

Easier said then done. You can see on this forum itself, the ones wanting real change are outnumbered 15-1. As for the Pak. govt. They have SO FAR not taken any action against extremism. Attacking few taliban outposts and giving statement is all they have done post that school attack. Nothing...

I am not against the profession of Doctor/Accountant either. I meant do you like to stay as a Muslim in a Hindu/Jews/Christian country with Hindu/Jews/Christian constitution.

Pakistan has been aggressive on borders for long. Indian side under congress used to ignore it to and look for peace. I think the current govt. has changed policy now. So the new message is if Pakistan does not stop firing, you should not also. This initial hot fight may be good in long term...

I may agree that right now the fight could be against Abdul Aziz, and once he is taken out, Hafiz can be handled later. So the assertion here being that Aziz is a bigger mole then Hafiz. So its about removing extremist elements one by one, and prioritizing on who needs to be taken out first...

Agree changing name alone will not make any difference. It needs to be a complete change - Name, Constitution, Education System.

Hafiz Sayeed is the same as the Mullahs in having extremist views. Whether he has huge followers or less followers is something that can be debated. But by the look of his rallies and hate speeches and the Millions the Pak govt. granted to him, I can say he is more influential than even the Lal...

So you want secular law and secular name for Pakistan? If so I would happily add your name. :)

The basic idea is whether you believe in a secular Pakistan and a secular society (same rules/values/constitution for all relgion people Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Ahmadis, Shias, Sunnis). It is not just a name change but more then that. Essentially it is about whether you believe in Secular...

ok so now I will start counting. I have two names in my list. @Peaceful Civilian and @Ussaid who want secularism in Pakistan. from this point will add more if I come across more. Or let me know if you know others.

Bro half sadist or not. Let me tell you he and his followers will kill you if you ask to implement secularism in Pakistan. If you intend to bring secularism in your country, hafeez Sayeed and his army will be your most fierce rival. Or prove me otherwise. You will be surprised and hugely...