:rofl: :rofl:
Oh phuddu, you aren't supposed to be loyal to China...only Pakistan. Ps, US-China competition intensifying will only help Pakistan and make it more valuable to China, not less.
"BuT mUH jF-17 :cry:" F*ck off, you autistic child
I mostly agree with your premise but that's not the whole truth. For example, the tempo-adjust fertility rate in Korea was still 1.4 in 2017. Tempo-adjusted TFR is the fertility rate that assumes constant marriage rate.
So if Korean marriage rates kept constant since 1990's, even then TFR...
Thank you. That's literally my point in this post.
As I said
"Its not to bash Korea. Korea is an amazing country through and through. All I am saying is that Korean miracle was not free of social externalities and that a better, more holistic approach to development can be taken instead of...
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Stop trying mate. Its abundantly clear to anyone with basic high-school macro economics background that you dont know what you are talking about. First thing, larger population does not automatically means larger share of working-age population...
Oh lol...I saw first four countries and didn't see US and commented. This list is definitely off. U.S does not produce less agricultural output than Iran. US feeds 300 million people and is one of the biggest exporter of many agricultural products. Iran feeds 80 million and exports less due to...
The list isn't accurate. Both US and China are not even listed. These two countries are agricultural behemoths.
Good to see brotherly Indonesia up there too btw. Arab world is probably one of the largest food import market of the world. Both Pakistan and Indonesia should capture that market as...
Fcuk Turkey, replace all my mentions of Turkey with....Israel and my core points still remain exactly the same. I have said it already. Surely, I ain't "worshipping" Israel now, am I? :lol:
That East Asian nationalist is cringest, sure, but you aren't much different repeating the same trite...
LOL, get basic high school level understanding of concepts before quoting me next time with your trite wall of texts, you laughable East-Asian nationalist "indian" :lol: Atleast put up the correct flags. You dont have to be so ashamed of your culture. Anyways....
PPP is not about population but...
They won't. Most of these social media ideological terrorists you see have connections with elites (that includes military elites).
See this post where I discussed it in a bit more detail...
Because its a sh*thole obviously lol. Millions of Indians prefer to live in Islamic lands as second class citizens than to live in their own country
I thought dharmics were against Muslims? :lol:
Absolutely. That's why I said immigration has been a 'competitive edge' to US, not that it is the primary reason for US domination.
The credit goes to US 100% in being a land that allowed immigrants to prosper when their own countries failed them mostly.
Hopefully most of these scholarships are awarded in hard sciences like Maths, Engineering, Agriculture, Physics etc and not social sciences that reproduce Nida Kirmanis and like, and send them to Pakistan
But I have a different hunch, alas!
Some laughable idiot Chinese trying to hide his countries glaring demographic problems: Do YoU MeAn WE TaKE immIGrAntS fRom AfRica lIke WesT? LoL
Immigrant from Africa in West:
:cheesy: :lol:
Yes, not all immigrants are Elon Musk. And yes, immigration does cause social friction in US etc...
LMAO nobody claimed Turkey is as developed as Korea. Its not.
I know you are too low IQ to understand my post even though I specifically wrote in my post as to why I chose Turkey (Hint: Both Korea and Turkey had almost same population and were similarly low income at the starting of comparison...
Lol nominal GDP per capita is pretty useless measure since 99% of the population engages in local markets day to day, not international markets in dollars.
PPP is a much better measure to guage citizenery's prosperity.
Besides, the crux of my post remains the same. If you want to see...
That is true but your categorization is reductionist. Offcourse developed countries and countries with already large populations will have lower fertility. However, its about healthy balance of economic progress, social preservation, and healthy family demographics. This is where East Asia has...
What percentage of Pakistani population have social behaviors and attitudes that correspond to these 'elitist' circles? Hardly 3-5% and that's an extreme stretch considering only 3% Pakistanis have university degrees to begin with (I checked this number a while ago. Wonder if this has changed)...