aur tum chammar ho kar aryan wannabe hoo, kuch to sharam karo.
Hame to koi phark nahi parta hai. Jin ki present aur future ki lagi hoti hai wahi past ki lete rahte hain.
chammar brahmin mera avatar dekh aur sharam kar. you look no different then chammars. acha huwa caste system haya warna pakistan bhi chammars se bara hota. ajeeb ghatiya koum hoo tum log
Tum to kuchh bhi nahi ho. Sirf wannabe ho. Isi liye to genealogy utha ka buddhe ki tarah fake history...
haha naukar aur chammars ka
when vedic aryans f your ASI ancestors the result was chammar, keep that in mind
Apni history utha kar dekh le, universal naukar. Tumhare lite to hamare chamar hi kaphi hai.
Chammar ki ulaad brahmin brahmin karne se kiya hogha. You still look like chammar and act like one.
Naukar log to tum ho. Aur hamesha Rahe ho, wannabe Arabs.
hahaha
Keep coming up with more RSS theories after being proven wrong in others :laughcry:, you only make sense to RSS hindutvas. :omghaha:
As a rule Brahmins don't argue with cowherds because they drag you to their level and then claim victory by making big dung cakes.
Your cowherd intellect is showing again. ANI and ASI are not the only genetic components in the subcontinent. There are at least 6-7 more. So does not mean that I'd ANI is 0, then ASI is 100.
If Pashtuns mixed 2200 years ago, it only means that your kind of low caste punjabis came to the sub continent around 1400 years ago. Since it is a well known fact, there is no need for any conjecture. The older ones had by that time moved east as Punjab had become too dry and the IVC had...
It only says they have no ANI. Where is it said they are 100percent ASI. What if they are 10 percent ASI and 90 percent Bantu or Japanese or whatever. Lookup, it also says the Onge have affinities with the Japanese. So , a Tamil Dalit has Japanese genes?
So what are you implying? The Vedas were written down just 2200 years ago?
The Pashtun are a mix of tribes. The Abdali tribe is said to be Hun. And looking at the pathetic intellect of the Pashtuns, they probably couldn't even write their name even if they were around.
They would have been under the Sikhs today if it was not for the British. That's why they were lackeys of the British and stayed away from the freedom struggle.
Doesn't matter. Unlike the cowards in Punjab, Hindus elsewhere always resisted.
Your contribution to the freedom struggle is a big zero but you got your country because of your specialization in being lackeys to the British.
And please tell this to all Punjabis who imagine having a great...
Because we had a cowardly population in Punjab who ,instead of resisting, acted as a doormat to any invader and allowed him in establish a base where he could regroup, strengthen and attach the rest of India.
When coming through the passes, the invader could not have numbered more than a...
It is accepted that the Jats, Gujars and Pathans were a part of Hun migration into India around 6th century AD. Too late for them to write Hindu scriptures.