Search results

You just used the term Aryan again. Are you just going to continue to use terms which belong elsewhere? The Indo-Aryans evolved from the PIE people in Central Asia. They became the Proto-Indo-Iranians, then the Indo-Iranians, and from them the Proto-Iranians and the Proto-Indo-Aryans emerged...

No, it most probably originated in the Horn of Africa or modern-day South Sudan (thereabouts). As for what I said, take a look: Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog: Dual origins of Sub-Saharan Africans?

Are you going to lecture me as you sit there combining phrases you don't even understand? You actually said "PIE Aryan". You literally combined two different groups of people, living in two different times, together! First things first. Distribution of the R1a haplogroup: Let me see... You...

Inferiority complex-ridden Indian who has to resort to ad hominems because he knows he belongs to a nation and a people which have nothing going for them. The Chinaman does not belong in my country, a country built by Europeans for Europeans. I, being the altruistic White person that I am...

Terms like "Hamite" are also hilariously outdated. These are just more 19th century racial classifications. You are referring to the East Africans, correct? They are an interesting story. The East Africans are genetically smack in the middle between sub-Saharan African Negroids and North...

Mix up of words there chief. The PIE descendants by the name of 'Indo-Aryans' no longer exist, not even in Eastern Europe, as you posited. If you are referring to the PIE themselves, the ancestors of the Indo-Aryans, then yes they do exist, all over Europe today. We are their descendants! The...

No one said we are invincible, but we have been barely defeated in the course of Human history. Why? Due to intellect mostly. Though East Asians tend to have higher average IQ's, Europeans have invented almost everything you see around you. Everything from the internet to spacecraft to the...

If you believe it's environmental, then why do Blacks with an income $80,000-$100,000 have kids that averaged 461 on Math and 468 on verbal on the SAT, while Whites with incomes under $10,000 had kids that averaged 478 on Math and 480 on verbal? And if you want to make it even more fair...

First of all, there is no concrete evidence for your theories on Europeans descending into the heartland of China. Secondly, in recorded Human history, Europeans have virtually never lost to Chinese in a single battle. In fact, we conquered most of the world, so referring to us as weaker...

Wrong. Africans do not have the intellect nor the personality, to be able to create, develop, and maintain an equal or superior system. There are many African nations which adhere to Communism, and capitalism. Those that adhere to capitalism end up in civil war, or massive corruption, or both...

Well, this should be interesting...

Well, India's GDP is roughly $1.8 trillion as of 2012, which puts it in line with Canada, not "the West". This alone signifies the dominance of the West over India. White-majority countries have a total GDP of approx. $40 trillion, as of 2012. Only China could possibly reach such a position...

Brown...??? Anyway, no one uses such classifications anymore. They are completely outdated and worthless. Sometimes I literally laugh out loud when reading studies and books from 19th century scientists, with their outdated "Malay" and "Yellow" and "Red" races. It's hilarious!

Yes. This is your mistake right here; Cro-Magnon belong to Homo Sapiens Sapiens. They are not a distinct Hominid. Yes, they were interbreeding freely. Because they diverged from each other at much later periods, and therefore had much less isolated evolution amongst them.

Read my comment first before responding. I said that the Cro-Magnons are our ancestors.

Not really. We don't have any intentions in taking away any of China's provinces. I don't have that much respect for the Uyghurs, and most Americans probably don't even know they exist. The liberal pacifist multicultural a$$wipes are the one's that keep shouting the Kum ba yah-like "free...

The scenario was already posted by me. It's on the first page. In a nuclear war the USA would not be destroyed, at least not with China's current nuclear capabilities.

Yes, seeing as how we have Chinese people all over the US, as politicians, media figures, and billionaires. Take a look at their popularity. Attack on Pearl Harbor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Spare me your sentimentality. Japanese war crimes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia...

And no one is advocating a nuclear attack. This is just a scenario. By the way, my data was off. The KIA of 11 million would have been due to US strikes on Chinese ICBM silos in the study I provided. Lol, it seems quite a few of you have a hard time understanding what a scenario is.

I already said that no one wants to nuke China. Stop acting like a child. Do you understand that this is just a scenario of a potential nuclear exchange, and that no one is advocating this at all? The Federation of American Scientists disagrees with you. Who am I supposed to believe...