No, not at all you intellectually inept clown.
The Vedas WAS written by Hindus. Hindus who descended from what is today Eastern Europe and basically created your culture, history, traditions, religions, and philosophy for you.
Maybe you need to get your head examined. Christianity in 1500...
I always found it strange that the average Indian actor/actress looked like they came from a different continent. These people have some serious personal issues they need to resolve:
LMFAO! The Vedas came from the Pontic-Steppe Proto-Indo-Europeans, who branched out into Indo-Aryans and came into India around the mid-2nd millenium BC.
Please don't tell me that Indians just magically become East Baltic with 60-90% having blue eyes, and fair skin.
We invented Hinduism...
:laugh:
Starting to realize this pretty quickly.
It's hilarious to think of Buddha as a blue-eyed Russian. It would be very awkard to see him as a blue-eyed Han Chinese or a blue-eyed Tamil! :yay:
Neo-Nazi? Are you braindead?
This is the MAIN theory that has consensus in the scientific community.
Kurgan hypothesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
What an absolute imbecile.
There's no point in listing the literally hundreds of thousands of studies that have already concluded that...
Wow, it seems like you people don't even know your own history (probably because we created it for you).
Sanskrit itself is a..... you guessed it! An Indo-ARYAN language.
The Indo-Aryan people were a branching off of the Proto-Indo-European people (known as PIE) that arrived in modern-India at...
Yes, with one exception.
The entire northern half of South Asia was invaded by the Indo-Aryans, largely displacing, but eventually interbreeding, with the native peoples. They brought their religion with them.
I have no idea. Ask your fellow 'North Hindu'.
What is your view on Indians? - Stormfront
Apparently it's a term used by Indians to separate themselves from the darker-skinned Australoid southerners, as well as to claim some sort of descent from the Europoid Indo-Aryan invaders. We get these...
Yep. The Arabs never really impressed me. The Byzantines alone were probably more innovative as a group. The Ottomans did get pretty damn inland though. They reached into the very heart of central Europe... *shudders*
Curry Masta, I was responding to his statement.
I know it's not Stormfront. If it was Stromfront, I'd be confronting a wannabe-White "northern Hindu Brahmin caste blah blah blah", as I'm doing as of this moment.
Well no, all you have to do is look at a PCA gene chart. Central Asians do not cluster with Europeans. They form their own population group, and cluster more as an in-between of Mongoloids and Caucasoid's.
Latin America is mostly non-White. The largest populations are usually mixed-race...
Trust me dude, you don't want to see pictures.
Anyone who would equate development potentials of China and India is a fool. I have been to both countries, not extensively but enough to get a feel of it.
When I hear 'India is the next China' I just roll my eyes and if I'm talking to someone...
List of countries by Human Development Index - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
No it's not. Other than the oil-rich Arab states, only East Asians make the list. 9 out of the top 10 are Western.
Thanks! As I have stated previously, do NOT accept immigrants into your country, whatsoever. Maybe fellow East Asians like Koreans and Japanese, but NO ONE outside of your race.
A homogeneous population is always more prosperous than a heterogeneous one.
:china:
Maybe because that 'nationality' has a larger combined population (1.35 billion) than all of Western/White civilization combined (1.2 billion).
It's a fair comparison. Oh, and Central Asians and Latin Americans are not Western, nor are they White.
Oh please, stop with the liberal, anti-wayycist, ********, feigning ignorance crap. It doesn't work. You know exactly what I meant.
We easily have the capability to destroy the world. Not that we would (we aren't outright savages like most of the rest of the world), but we could. Tell me, other...