Search results

We make fun of **** videos, but most of the public just sees the video and takes it as truth. They'll just see the "Rafale" performing, and criticise the LCA more. Speaking of **** journalism, anyone noticed how often they print the range of artillery guns as 10,000 km. :rofl:

I suggest that you remove the picture. They are part of the Russian Knights, the pic doesn't belong on this thread.

Global Hawk is a HALE UAV. Why would the development of that UAV have any effect whatsoever on the development of a MALE UCAV?

Lol, Brits were on our side, what a laugh. :lol: "Our" side? Our side was the Bangla side genius.

I just can't believe it. Every second day there is news of a Pakistani LoC violation, and it's just dismissed as propaganda, and once, there is news of an Indian violation, you guys are all dancing with joy? Not to mention the news is disputed as well.

I just love how you guys are trying to take all the credit for yourself. :lol: Get real, it would have taken close to a year for your "Mukti Bahini" to liberate you. India did it in 14 days, be grateful. Not to mention that the Bahini was trained and equipped by RAW.

The problems with everyone. DRDO for announcing stuff, and delaying it for months, years, etc. The army, for not trying to work with DRDO, like choosing to use the basic the INSAS model and criticising it, instead of using the upgraded ones a try, saying there's problem but not upgrading GSQR...

Like what we have right now? Ak-47s and INSAS? AFAIK, the guns are quite different, and aren't compatible with each other. Meaning if a soldier needs 5.56 he needs and INSAS, and 7.62 he needs an AK. The IA will have to buy 2 different guns for each soldier. With one type of gun firing...

Yes, there are significant differences. No, he won't field strip the rifle. The rifle will be customised prior to the mission. If the soldier is going outduring a conventional war, he'll carry 5.56mm version, for CoIn he'll carry 7.62 version. If the mission is a mix of both, he may either...

WTF? When I do a search for similar images, it says Best guess for image: MiG 23 (they write it in Arabic *scratches head*). Then I scroll down and see, MiG 27 drawings. MiG-27 FLOGGER MiG 27 Fighter Bomber Will Have New Engines Most sites say it's a MiG 27.

Then they said: The Arjun is too heavy to be carried. :rolleyes:

The only way that this news can make sense (with regard to the earlier news of 5 overseas vendors), is if the media conveniently avoided the mention of DRDO as a participant in the trials (unlikely, but still, food for thought). Use Space Bar and Enter once in a while. :D

*scratches head in confusion. If I throw a grenade at people, and police come to kill me, will the people really protect me from the police? :rolleyes:

Why are you so intent on defending criminals?

That's just excuses. I stated a fact, that previously, Pakistan has tried the ridiculous idea of using PAF for defence only, and attacking without air cover, both the times it failed miserably. I used it as an example to say how ridiculous the idea of having an AF for defence-only purposes is.

I wasn't even aware that they were involved in Wazristan.

I speak sensibly when required, and troll, when there's nothing better on the thread. :lol:

Sure, I'm waiting for the exposure with baited breath. :rofl:

Us low-class terrorists should readily sacrifice ourselves for their noble cause of killing "Hindu KGB". :lol:

You possess a remarkable ability of making yourself look less and less credible with each word you type. :lol: I'm proud of Vajpayee for insulting the ISI infiltrators. :rofl: