Search results

The Germans had more solidarity and cohesion. Thankfully with Indians, it's a collection of ethnic groups with different racial and communal anxieties. They'll lynch each other before they ever reach Nazi Germany's level.

I don't even consider them humans at this point. They're automatons to me. All of them waiting for instructions and commands from their local BJP IT cell on Whatsapp.

Can you give me an example of how our media lied during the Balakot strike and the aftermath? While you do that, let me just post this for everyone.

What they're going to do next is create a bunch of fake IDs on Twitter and claim that 60 gorillion Chinese soldiers died at the hands of Lord Hanuman himself, and that India has already taken over Tibet. They pulled this exact stunt on us a while ago and used fake IDs to claim the IAF forced...

You sound really confused right now. Look over your posts again and you'll see why I said what I said.

The difference is that it's your politicians who are conjuring lies about surgical strikes, Hanuman soldiers and 400 confirmed kills, while the best you can do is point at a few posters on this thread.

I read it, it doesn't change anything.

Why are you rattling off credentials like an NPC in response to a simple fact? Pakistan didn't start 1971.

Calling every Muslim a Mulla is very common in Indian political discourse. On the other hand, call @Soumitra a naked, unwashed Yogi caked in ash, and you're a Hinduphobe!

I'm pretty sure every soldier who died a few days ago was a Hindu. That's what I mean by Hindu. Maybe, but in this case, the Chinese faced vegetable-devouring Hindus (which might explain why so many perished to sticks).

The Pakistan Army didn't start the 1971 war though. I know you think of us as evil cow-killing mlecchas, but that doesn't mean you can just say blatantly false things to us.

Are they as aggressive as the Hindu soldiers who got killed by a bunch of bats and pipes?