Search results

I will keep the list up-to date as changes do occur. However at this time I will not speculate.

My source is good, so far there has only been 1 intelligent person that understood the authenticity of this list.

It is sad that you seem to mock this very value information that I have provided to PDF, instead of appreciating my efforts.

Based on, means for war. Sorry this cant be done, UK's means for war significantly outweighs that of India.

Are you a ghost account of "arp2041" I am suspecting this, based on your reaction.

Saudi Arabia's position in the list falls in a bit of a grey area on my source. It maybe pulled a few notches down. I cannot speculate at this stage exactly to what extent.

This person speaks Tamil, I have confirmed that with a transcript he had sent to me. And he also speaks Sinhala. I have no doubt, this person is here to tarnish my image.

I re-checked the assessment and unfortunately I cannot do that. India's resources for war out weighs that of Pakistan. Does anybody else have any reasonable position challenges?

Which position would you like it to be at?

Don't Hijack my thread or mock me. I'm providing you a very value information. Without me PDF will never see the daylight of such a list. I am now regretting even telling you.

The Luxemburg vs afghan assessment was made excluding US help. Afghan army cannot stand on its own.

$2.2 Billion USD vs 1.3 Billion USD. No questions here

You have no military experience. Thank you for your opinion.

On a firepower assessment yes. However to beat a country, you need at least 3 times the resource allocation. To do it comfortably you need at least 5 times.

450 well equipped, well trained soldiers. Not rag tags.

I don't need your opinions. Thank you.

Luxembourg Army - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This doesn't even make any sense. Please don't challenge the rank order.

This just website made by someone. My source has very high creditability.

What is the problem?