The sight is always there... a little differently placed on leo2A5 and 6 perhaps... here is the Leo2A4... and the modernized version.
Arujn would not have NERA but ERA.
It would be a little difficult to position ERA in such a manner... however the weak spot hit probability is reduced...
I don't care what some random member from xyz country says... you can decide yourself.
May be the Ukrainian govt. was not as smart as some random polish citizen... and developed a better tank.
You got to be mentioning which T-90 you are talking about... this can mislead readers.
For example the wielded turret on T-90C/S comes from the Object 187 project... which was designed beat even 140mm western projectiles of that time... on the main frontal armor... aided with 2nd gen. ERA...
There is a lot of armor behind the sight to go with it.... you can say the same about Leo 2 designs.
The Ceramic based armor design is the most effective when the armor is flat and not sloped... you see the same in latest tanks sch as Leo2A6...which has been a successful export.
Behind the...
The 1st models of T-90S were cast turret... low amount of composites... and cast design as on Pakistani T-80U.
The latter models were wielded turret design with much better protection levels as compared with T-80U.
Arjun have had certain issues with its design no-doubt... but the bad...
It works and that is enough.... even If the success rate is about 20% lets say.. there was no shortage of missiles or the platform using them... say flying in pairs even 2 kills achieved out of 10 fired seriously degrades enemy's fighting capability.
Same can be said about AMRAAM which had a...
I don't have time to correct your nonsense here... go and give a good read on both Arjun and Al Khalid and also western and soviet tank designs before coming for debate.
I have not even concluded... I am not the one who is saying Al Khalid is better than Arjun... and you say I speculating.
How ?
How does muzzle velocity alone makes Al Khalid rounds superior ?
How exactly[120mm rifled vs 125mm smoothbore]... Arjun rounds can produce more than 6500bars chamber...
To troll.
You didn't compare available data... else you wouldn't have concluded.
Average applies for many factor... in a battle Al Khalid average rate can be as low as 0 if auto loader stops working... It doesn't give the proper picture of the rate of fire in different conditions... in battle...
I see its pointless arguing on this as you have made it clear that Al Khalid is better than Arjun no matter what----
8-6 rounds per minute is average.
It can be upto 15 rounds in a minute by a well built loader.... no the auto-loader can only do 8 rounds per minute... you can read about the...
I just quoted a part of it.. and it sounds reasonable... It doesn't have to be a masala necessarily since its from BR.
Back then in late 80s and 90s when your Airforce got F-16... RWR was a crucial asset on Mig29 something for which IAF pilot really appreciated them having.. more than the BVRs...
You took me wrong here... I know why pilot takes those maneuvers... I was the one who once mentioned in some thread that how a cobra maneuver makes the radar lose the track of aircraft.
What I asked was what masala was there in my post... where that retired officer makes a balanced...
Besides that I wold like to point out the poor hardware on Al Khalid as evident from images floating around internet.
Note: The skirts are coming off in public display in front of the Guests and public... wonder what would happen in wartime.
What is like mirch masala in what I posted... please clarify...
What would a pilot do when there's a BVR lock ?.. try to break it by performing maneuvers in the clouds or continue flying towards the enemy to eliminate him ?... even If he's a rising star or superstar.
Its quiet normal for...