Search results

How do you figure? They are kissing Each Other while your religious extremists trying impose their views on someone else

Hey, I'm not one clicking the like button on topics I know nothing about just so someone would like me. No girlfriend either, I presume? I don't blame them. You're too boring. I notice you use a lot of laugh moticons even on things that aren't funny. Is that what you do in real life too? Is that...

No, but your lack of even the most rudimentary knowledge of a thread you're rating does bring a tear to my eye. :tsk: So no friends in real life, I assume?

So shouldn't you do that BEFORE you rate a post? Or is that just too much to ask?

Ah so this is what the term "blind leading the blind means"! I finally get it!

That's what we're here for. To help you appreciate the little things in life. You're welcome :enjoy:

I think that goes without saying. It was more of a rhetorical question:D

Nah, it's just this one dude who keeps on and on like a broken record! Give him pointers, dude. Get him some new material. He's putting everyone to sleep here. He says forward policy one more time, I'm gonna shoot myself:suicide:

This is exactly what I'm talking about. Those pakistani posters would have 4 comebacks for me. You? You're just repeating yourself. You've got to be quick and You've got to be clever. Lemme ask you something. Do you have any friends?

Boring someone to tears and bringing someone to tears are two diametrically opposite concepts, my friend. Bringing someone to tears requires a rapier wit, ruthlessness and the ability to come at them from different angles. Boring someone to tears, on the other hand... Well, there's no need to...

I wouldn't call it crying. I'd describe it more as boring me to death. Look through @AsianUnion 's posts. They are always different and he brings in new material. Look at his range of arguments. I mean, that's good stuff. You, on the other hand, don't have any material, you're not even a little...

Nah dude, you're actually way cleverer than him. Atleast when I'm arguing with you, you always come back with something new and make it fun. Give him some pointers. He's boring me to death here.

Why would think it was you? Is it because people tell you that all the time in real life too?

Unless you belonged to one of those royal families, you got nothing. This is the first time the China has existed. Before that, it was the kingdoms of the dynasties. It had absolutely nothing to do with the nation state that is China today.

We don't have a problem with the Chinese per say. It's just one particular poster. He doesn't break the rules of the forum, he just bores us to death by repeating the same drivel over and over and over. I mean, how many times read the same, stupid thing on every thread till you feel like killing...

Lol, no it didn't. It belonged to various emperors, the last being the Qing empire. So unless you're gonna pretend to be the descendent of the Qings, the nation state of People's Republic of China roughly the same age as the Republic of India

And the concept of China was created by communist party. What's your point?

"Probably"?? Hedging your bets there?:p:

I'm sure Indians own apartments in Hong Kong too. Also the apartments in Hong Kong are kinda small for the money you pay.

Relatives strongly suspect the incident to be a case of ‘honour killing’. “Rumours of an illicit affair between a married lady in an upper-caste household, who lived adjacent to the Jadhav’s farm, and a member in the Jadhav family, had been festering for more than a year. This may have led to...