Search results

Yeah I read all five. Why would I comment if I didn't? One guy saying that the other guy told him is not exactly evidence. Couple are news reports and the rest a opinions and conjectures (just like yours) that are meant to imply that it's not Pakistan's fault. Keep it up. Soon you'll another...

Did you happen to read the links you posted? The gist, since you obviously didn't read them, was that one guy is accusing another guy of having said it and the other hasn't acknowledged that he did. Not sure how that is conclusive evidence except in the mind of Pakistani.

I think sock and foot might be a more appropriate term since those Hindus typically tend to shove their foot up your terrorists' rear :D

@Ragnar Is that the same movie as Lawrence of Arabia? Or is this a more, shall we say, explicit interpretation of the events? :lol:

So your evidence of hindu terrorism is political sniping between the ruling party and the opposition and a column by a pakistani columnist? Good job:enjoy:

No there really isn't evidence swinging both ways. On one side is facts, on the either side is far fetched ideas. There is no equivalency there. It's only in the minds of the most hardcore conspiracy theorists and people who just don't want to face the truth for their own reasons.

Believe me, every morning, millions of peole wake up on the other side of the border and say that exact thing too :D

I guess I must have misunderstood you when you said "those who went with the Gujarat massacre... Oops he's your PM". You must have meant Manmohan Singh. I must also have misunderstood you when you said nothing was established on 9/11, Godhra or Mumbai incidents either. Of course, the obvious...

So to sum up your posts on this thread, there is evidence that Modi had Muslims killed in Gujarat but not evidence that the 9/11 conspirators, the Godhra arsonists and Ajmal Kasab were Muslims? Just want get a feel for where you stand here so I don't "malign" you like I did before.

Been thinking that very same thing since the ceasefire violations started.

2 reasons. First, she's no longer with us. Second, she visited me here a couple of times. First one was when I was living in sin with my girl friend and seemed perfectly fine with it.:-)

Let them be.

I don't think it was about Christians vs Muslims. In most parts of country, the lineage is paternal. So every time a hindu boy marries a girl from another religion, I think we feel like we've gained something while everytime it goes the other way, we feel like we're losing something. Perhaps...

You asked what a navigator did. So I answered. Obviously, I can't comment on what Columbus' instructions were to his navigator. Here's a flaw in your reasoning. Anyone who'd been to the Americas and back would have known that that wasn't India because it would go against everything they knew...

I wouldn't go that far. If girl was hindu and guy was muslim, people like black widow would be swearing up and down that it was love jihad. The problem is, we look at our sisters and daughters as property or at best, an extension of ourselves. That's why we are so sensitive when they marry...

You know the Virgin Mary and Mary Magdalene are 2 different people, right?

Navigating. Captain says I want to go east. Navigator decides which way is east and which path to take to avoid any known obstacles. Does that make sense?

@TankMan The events from the last few years has given the racists & bigots of this world the green light to come out and present their views as legitimate arguments and they are being echoed by fools who wouldn't know their elbow from their ******e. People are bullies by nature. They love to...

I think there is only one conclusion that can be drawn from this. The Turkish president has an account on PDF:D Muslims in the Americas before Columbus

:rofl: