Search results

Hmm actual military conflict occurred between Japan and China for victory or defeat to occur. Not the case in 1967 and 1987.

The PLA follows high up command. Fear of death for disobeying orders not to engage is not dishonorable. And if they actually were ordered to fight they certainly would. And your implication that they would lose has no precedent.

Did I say that? your Indian compatriot says that Chinese corruption is higher. I only refuted him. Do not put words in my mouth. There are claims of corruption the crash and if they are proven true then the director certainly will be executed.

Thats not what casualty statistics show. Despite Human wave tactics Indians suffered far heavier casualties throughout the war.

Yes Indians are quite content to brag about lack of military conflict rather than actual performance in military conflicts.

Yes Indians are quite content to brag about lack of military conflict rather than actual performance in military conflicts.

Yet the choices are between dumb and dumber isn't it, and the people always manage to pick the dumber one.

Generally human wave attacks against fortified positions would cause a disproportionate amount of casualties for the attacking side. Why was this not the case for the Sino Indian War? I mean even a pretty inept soldier would manage to kill a person in a wave at least once right?

It sounds like something Kim Jong il would write.

Rule to their deaths? Hu Jin Tao is stepping down in less than a year.

No. You get executed in China. As for corruption, you can see for yourself Transparency International - the global coalition against corruption

"Large marching Indian infantry" LOL. Still using British continental methods of war I see.

Nah, It seems the more corrupt you are in India the more powerful you get

LOL. Just like Chinese would turn back when confronted by Indians in the foward policy right? Obviously never learn do you?

Do you think a country is only measured by its military power? In raw Nuclear firepower Russia is even ahead of the US but does that make them first? As for third India is 10th economically with a military weaker than Russia's. So no.

Was the British grabbing the Falklands from the rightful Argentinians? Why does no one care about those rules then?

And its this kind of irrelevancy that makes you look so funny. North Vietnam's forces might treat the South Koreans differently but non combat Chinese troops have nothing to do with it besides your personal speculation.

What is it about currently do you not understand?

Would that have mattered to non combat troops?

Don't make me laugh. Lets talk about currently shall we. India has all foreign Precision weapons, Artillery, and even majority of tanks. Even indigenous things like the Arjun depend on the supply of German engines. There is no possible way of sustaining a war with that kind of foreign dominated...