Search results

IAF MiG-29UPG 'Blue 921' armed with an RVV-AE BVRAAM at Zhukovsky. 921 is a temporary Russian tail number for flight testing in Russia. The Indian tail number for this aircraft is KBU3123. Previously the unupgraded aircraft had the KB3123 tail number, addition of 'U' in the tail number prefix...

Su-30MKI may get structural refit to serve until 2050 as we are doing with our jags. Anyways, once if AMCA will met enormous success than it'll pave way for another project either on our own or under a JV.

Right now its 2017 and Su-30MKI will phased out after 2042. It's quite earlier to predict it.

@Gessler Su-30MKI was Inducted in 2002 and will serve for atleast 40years. So please correct your records. AMCA will be the replacement for Jaguar and Mig-29's which has phase out schedule after 2030. This was my reply when you said no-one has Capability to produce jets at such rate. Don't...

Don't get confused, The time shared by me for the first flight. US produced f-16 at average rate of 30 units/year with peak rate of 59 units /year. Along with F-15 at 24 units/year & f-18 at 18 units/year. Trainers and transport aircrafts are not included. India produced su-30mki at 16...

Both projects will run in parallel. For infrastructure : FGFA will use Su-30MKI Production lines while AMCA will use Tejas Production line which will get free or partially free after 2025. For funds: AMCA is under development phase and earlier this year got funds to produce full scale model ...

This will be a great achievement for IAF and will give a setback to both Easter and western Enemies. Now, I can hope AMCA's first flight by 2025 if FGFA gets Airborne by 2020.

If you have any Official Document which states that both are not same Projects, than only continue to reply on this topic otherwise keep your fake claims only upto you.

Either you are now getting mad or your are previously mad. Both FC-1 & JF-17 are same program. You can check out your official Chinese record. AGAIN I REQUEST YOU NOT TO DERAIL THIS THREAD LIKE CHINA IS DOING At DOKLAM

The FC-1 traces its origin to the Super-7 fighter programme, a joint Chengdu-Grumman development project worth US$500 million to upgrade the Chengdu J-7 (MiG-21F-13 ‘Fishbed-C’) fighter and the development agreement was signed in 1986 (parallel to TEJAS) Whereas, the JV and agreement with...

Actually, when it comes to jet development, we believe our Marshalls when they concerned about our own projects . Anyways, leave it. Now, come to the point, what was the reason which force you guys to start development of FC-1 and when it failed , you guys stopped the Project. After that , you...

If want to see him, just watch the show and truth said by him and I request you to use decent choice of words. ENJOY THE SHOW

Yup, that guy was HASSAN NASIR from Pakistan. I

LoL, at least you understand English. For FC-1 , I have a question, why PLAAF isn't inducting that so called next generation jet? Good Luck!

Nice troll man But we didn't change the name of any project just for screwdriver tech and paint job.

I can't do anything in this case, if you show your ignorance towards failed FC-1 later renamed JF-17 Project.

Are you a Oxford learner. Please correct your English first. You better understand my words but trying to ignore it. Hope you heard about FC-1 (a failed Chinese Project, rejected by PLAAF)

It seems, you are very reluctant to resolve issues raised by foreign members (specially Indian) Anyways, keep it up if you guys like it. Moreover be happy with improved Saab safari aka mushshak.

Yup, junk Fighter also belongs to China but not in Chinese territory hence there are 2 crashes in open media. Actually, India believes in peace and have no first Attack nature. If you guys have balls than attack us than we will taught the real meaning of war (ask you ally , they knows it...

What thing you found naughty in that post? Please reinstate your vision.