Search results

No. FC-31 is aimed at export market so far. I don't think it is a good idea that navy and air force share the same armament platform. Just look at F-35.

People should pay for what they have done or their parents have done. One day, when China is strong enougth that Western country could not stand any chance to strike China with Tibet issue, these Tibetans may come back , i guess.

I don't think it is related with tradition. It's related to millitary technology and types of warfare. You know the universe has its own law which may be found by Westerners not invented by them. The destoryer nowdays is totally different from that in WWII in terms of displacement , usage ...

No one would do such thing. Armament is designed and development to combat. What its name and how to categorize doesn't matter. Soviet Union called its carrier as airborne cruiser, and Japan called its carrier as airborne frigate. Does these names have anything with the nature of these warship...

Your democary means Indian people could insult and harm northeast people, cause indian outnumber northeast people.

Have you ever come to China or Taiwan? Do you ever know something about China civil war? No knowledge, no statement. Do not be a typical Indian used to talk nonsense.

There is no invade,cause both sides are Chinese. Every year, lots of Taiwanmese went to mainland to see their relatives.

It is ridiculous to hear the inheritor of the biggest conlonist point at other as colonist. It is ridiculous to hear the inheritor of the biggest conlonist point at other as colonist.

Chinese just need develop our country and technology ,then anyone want to be your citizen.Look at how many Mexicans in US. Just let Indian stage their show. As soon as we catch the chance of next technological revolution , our people could enjoy extra welfare, which could make others want to...

Suppressing AD combat need time which is enough for DPRK to launch a attack at Seoul with the artilleries. If war is really started, DPRK would not stand a chance to win. All he can do is to jeopardize SOK or Japan as hardly as possible.

SOK is really scared of such guns, cause quite a part of Seoul is in their range. But fighter jets could not shoot down projectiles. These artilleries are used to make sure a mutual destruction with SOK.

There are more than tens of thousands of guns deployed in bunkers underneath in a hundreds of squared kilometers zone ,it's hard to eliminate them in once attack before they could counter attack. They have some SA-3 and SA-6 SAMs and indigenous replicas .

Compared to the so-called nuclear ballistic missile, DPRK's huge amount of long range artillery is a real substantial threat to SOK.

Leave these Tibetans alone. Their parents betrayed China and chose to be refugees .South Tibet was occupied by Indian Army. They have no choice and such kind of show doesn't matter. One day when Chinese army move into South Tibet, I bet these people would welcome more enthusiastically.

The carrier do make others listen to you more clearly and patiently.

In post 2030, I think Liaoning and 001A could be available for BD and Pakistan, cause the two carriers with ski-jump deck are stopgap for PLAN. With a 300 meter long deck, it could provide a substantial advantage on either defensive or offensive combat.

It's not a good idea because of inefficiency. In that situation, you could only launch a jet once a time. More worse, the work of takeoff and take back could not be conducted simultaneously. It is practical that there must at least be a 250 meters long main deck with a angle deck . I don't...

For that objective,carrier matters

Sorry，ihave made a mistake