Search results

Honestly I don't know who the actress is.

For tourists its the best to go to peninsular India as it is the most developed region of South Asia. On the other hand north India and particularly eastern India are some of the least developed regions of South Asia so I wouldn't recommend you to go there. But if you really want to visit north...

You mean this song A good friend sent it to me. I don't even understand one word but the song is awesome.

If you were never in india before then you should go to Gujarat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Maharashtra - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Karnataka - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia or Kerala - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia But for Arabs its probably the best to go to Kerala which...

Peninsular India consists of the Indian states of Gujarat, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andra Pradesh, Kerala and Tamil Nadu. How about this one Kerala has the best beaches.

Peninsular India and Gujarat are the most developed regions of South Asia so its the best place for tourists. I was born in the land of Shivaji Maharaj if you know what that means.8-) But I grew up in a foreign country.

The Rashtrakuta Dynasty ruled the major part of Peninsular India from the 8th to the 10th century. Peninsular India stretches from Maharashtra in the north to Kerala in the south.

Actually Arabia had even a greater relationship with peninsular and southern India during the early medieval period. The Arabs established several trading posts in southern India during the rule of the Rashtrakuta Dynasty in the 8th and 9th century. During the early medieval period several...

The funny thing is that India, Greece and Iran which produced some of the greatest mathematicians of the ancient and medieval world and which laid the foundation for modern mathematics have failed in this year.

This is not true. A lot of Hindus from different castes did eat meat during ancient and medieval period and still eat meat today. Only the Brahmin Hindus and the Jains were and are still hardcore vegetarians.

The main problem of India is the fact that India unlike China is a federal country where Indian states follow their own politics. This is one of the main reasons for the huge discrepancy between the development of the different Indian states.

Well, the Pakistanis have a different view of history. The Indians still celebrate the destroyers of the Mughal Empire like Shivaji, Bajirao and Mahadji Shinde on the other hand the Pakistanis celebrate invaders like Bin Qasim and Babur who committed atrocities during their invasion of Pakistan.

Lol, thats a good joke. At the last World Cup Japan qualified for the second round and Japan always represents Asian football well. Thank goodness that Chinese and Arab teams did not qualify for the World Cup as these teams would have truly brought shame to Asia by time wasting and cheating.

Well, there are barely any ancient or early medieval Buddhist and Hindu buildings in modern Pakistan, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh because most of the building were destroyed by the Turkic Delhi Sultanate rulers. All the great buildings from ancient and early medieval period are from Rajasthan...

You know what is funny. There is not even one statue for the Mughal rulers in India. But there are statues for Shivaji Maharaj, Lachit Borphukan, Bajirao and Krishnadevaray in India.

The great rulers of India in the 16th, 17th and 18th century were Krishnadevaraya of the Vijayanagar Empire, Shivaji Maharaj of the Maratha Empire, Lachit Borphukan of the Ahom kingdom, Bajirao of the Maratha Empire Tipu Sultan of the Mysore kingdom, Maharana Pratap of Mewar and Mahadji Shinde...

This is not religious history. Guru Nanak was a contemporary of Babur who witnessed the barbaric atrocities of Babur and his army. Guru Nanak records: "Having attacked Khurasan, Babur terrified Hindustan. The Creator Himself does not take the blame, but has sent the Mughal as the messenger of...

Guru Nanak and Babur were contemporaries. Guru Nanak was born in the 15th century and died in 1539 in Punjab. The Sultanate of Delhi did not bring any stability to India as the Sultanate was only able to conquer much of northern India during the reign of Alaudin and after his death the Sultanate...

What are you talking about? This only shows that Babur was a good strategist and nothing else. Medieval literature like the text of Guru Nanak Dev clearly describe how the Muslim and Hindu citizens had to suffer because of the barbaric invasion of Babur.