Societies are always shaped by their demographics. Democratic western society is based on greek philosophy, because the greeks were European and they influenced all the peoples of Europe. In India Hindus demographically, politically and economically predominate. So naturally Indian democratic...
I feel no shame in being ruled by non Hindus. The Muslim rulers of India ruled India for a reason. They were better organized, more motivated and had better military technology. But ultimately Islamic countries were unable to cope with a changing world. That system that propelled them to conquer...
Learning about other philosophies expands your thinking. Depending on your point of view the Gita and Ramayana can be viewed as philosophical and/or religious texts.
Sikhs make up 1.73% of Indian population.... wasn't one of the PMs of India a Sikh (Manmohan Singh).
India's also had 4 Muslim presidents and 1 Sikh president.
Its not discrimination its competition. Had Muslims been the more educated and industrious they would be the leaders and the Hindus the followers.
Islam ruled India because Mulsims were ahead of Hindus in organization and education. You can't say that in the present.