What's new

Search results

  1. ThinkLogically

    Taiwan denies their AIM-120C-5 missiles

    Then it also means that ISPR has been lying all the time that they did not use any F16.
  2. ThinkLogically

    Now that India has lost the war with Pakistan, what is the impact on India's security?

    Religion, if my guess on his religion based on his user name is correct. They can't stomach an overt Hindu dominated party ruling over them.
  3. ThinkLogically

    Pakistani Snipers Taking out Indian personnel on LOC

    There are millions of people in India who speak / tweet against the government. Nothing will happen to them. Only the fake handles created by some propaganda machine has been deleted. Poor folks all your efforts are going in vain, try some other profile next time.
  4. ThinkLogically

    India lost the war for the first time against Pakistan and the buck stops at Modi's Desk.

    Funny guys here speaking as if there is no tomorrow. You guys feel so insecure that a minor victory in a battle make you think that you have won the war.
  5. ThinkLogically

    Why is India Military losing the war with Pakistan?

    Sorry, India is still leading the war race. India: 2 (Balakot + 1 F16) Pak: 1 (Mig 21)
  6. ThinkLogically

    27 Feb 19: PAF shot down two Indian aircrafts inside Pakistani airspace: DG ISPR

    Cool down man. I am just representing my country just like you represent yours.
  7. ThinkLogically

    27 Feb 19: PAF shot down two Indian aircrafts inside Pakistani airspace: DG ISPR

    For all those who were asking me for proof and all those who were abusing me. Proof for India 2 (Balakota + F16) - Pak 1 (Mig 21) were given by yourself unwittingly. Let me explain. Balakota: you guys have even drone shot of the place where Indian Plane dropped it's drop tank. That place...
  8. ThinkLogically

    Sushma Swaraj in China: India does not want to see further escalation

    You don't worry about us. We know what to do. I have a lot of past inspirations about you. At least we did not let go of the attacker without a loss.
  9. ThinkLogically

    Sushma Swaraj in China: India does not want to see further escalation

    Why don't you intend to tell us that you will take action on an organization which has taken public responsibility of Pulwama.
  10. ThinkLogically

    Sushma Swaraj in China: India does not want to see further escalation

    Ok, then if the guy was a Kashmiri then why did JeM in your land took responsibility. Osama was not in US when he took responsibility of 9/11 does it absolve his involvement.
  11. ThinkLogically

    Sushma Swaraj in China: India does not want to see further escalation

    You were intending to target a Brigade HQ, isn't that serious. The reality is that you AF were not able to. You shot down our AF in your air space which is expected.
  12. ThinkLogically

    Sushma Swaraj in China: India does not want to see further escalation

    lame answer, no one in Indian soil took responsibility.
  13. ThinkLogically

    Sushma Swaraj in China: India does not want to see further escalation

    We too could have hit the defense installations but we did not want too. Our target is just the non-state actors in your soil. For this why do you have to target our military installations.
  14. ThinkLogically

    Sushma Swaraj in China: India does not want to see further escalation

    Did you authorities ever ask why JeM took responsibility if Pulwama was not planned from your soil. You guys started the escalation there.
  15. ThinkLogically

    27 Feb 19: PAF shot down two Indian aircrafts inside Pakistani airspace: DG ISPR

    Perfectly Ok, if we take down one F16 for every loss of ours as happened this time. How many aircrafts do you have to match this attrition?
Back
Top Bottom