Search results

U R Right.. But at the same time we shud not refreign ourselves from the reality... Earlier it was MIG 21 & 27, Now its MMRCA.. Chill man, his thoughts r aprreciated on his thoughts, if he changed then we r not changing our course of action... Bolo Ta Ra Ra Ra...

A beautiful thought... This is called a rational thinking..:cheers:

AESA is cofirmed. But there is a huge fight goin b/w Irkut and HAL on Brahmos configuration.. Sukhoi is asking for too much of money where DRDO/HAL scientists are confident that they can do the job with half of what sukhoi is asking for.. Another glitch is that Sukhoi is not allowing HAL to make...

We only have a See Harrier enabled carrier as of now, The SH fleet size is less than 10.. 2 ACs with 24 Mig 29K are decent and sufficient to cater our immediate requirements.. 2020 onwards we can see a bigger AC with more carrier borne aircrafts and complete 3CBGs.. Till then fingers are crossed..

IAC 2 is still on drawing board, The specifications are not finalised as the IN is riding very high on IAC 2. EMALS and Nuke power may be included.. So this is not the right time to discuss abt IAC 2..

commendable job by PN.. Keep the momentum going.. Thanx PN

Doubtful.. This cant be an A\C..

If u r really stating about same numbers of poor Indians (Not in %, as population is growing but number of poors are the same), then u r accepting that our poverty elemination programme is doing well.. So whats wrong.. Another thought, at the time of crisis (Any misadventure frm external...

As economy is growing so the threats.. 1.5 trillion dollar should cross 2.5 tril at the end of this decade.. So it is quite justified to hv 4 cbgs to secure our shores and waters from any kind of threat.. So Chill..

Vikramaditya + IAC 1 + IAC 2 will be operational within this decade.. IAC 3 is in a cenception Phase.. IAC1 will be 40000 ton & 65000 ton IAC 2. India precisely needs atleast 10 Nuke Subs and 20-30 Diesel-electric subs.. The Other counts are also needed to be increased to become a true...

point c is baseless, keep cricket aside.. dont forget it provided an avenue for a gr8 meet between ur PM n our PM.. POint B is some how a business call, ur gain our loss.. Its not abt Pakistan, its for any country.. Yes we might hv a good business strategy against u in the international...

For India n Pakistan, a bilateral agro trade is in place (take it or discard it). We r the lagest importer of onions and exporter of wheat. I think MFN is premature as of now.. but yes if any such thing is coocking, then definitely its a nice gesture for the future endeavour of both the...

Beautiful Presentation... Hats off!! Some verbal description wud hv made it better..

Humare pikistani bhaiyon khahan gaye? Yaar Kuch to input daalo.. 11 biilion dollers are in stake.. We need ur inputs if any...

Agreed.. But goin in for a Kaveri, I think the french should hv offred anything like TVC engine.. This wud hv a great combi - Beast in a beauty (New Term although).. :cheesy:

Boss is there any other option in MMRCA tender? So Chill Yaar.. Let see how we can implement our licenses in shaping out AMCA a truly 5th gen figher craft...

Rafale wud be good choice for India as the IAF is well acquinted with French systems. The previous platform (mirage) was highly successful with IAF. EF were better if there were only one country involved in development. French are always a reliable supplier and it is time tested(post pokhran) ...

IAF and IA should hv gone for a Mid Range SAM like this before IN.. There is a GAP in this category for both IA n IAF..

We must hv similiar system for IAF and Indian Army too.. Any news on Akash Mk2?

You r right bro! It should be AVATAR - Reusable Satelite Launcher.. The journos probably made a wrong interpretation of his msg.. Dr. Kalam Rocks! :tup: