Search results

漢人自古尚武，漢唐男子出門必配劍。倭人的"武士道" 和西洋人"胡蘿蔔加大棒"哲學的老祖宗就是漢人。 漢文化講究陰陽平衡， 故君子重文武兼修。強國戰略則是陰陽並應，陷陣克敵, 斬郅支首及名王以下，宜懸頭槁於蠻夷邸間，以示萬里，明犯強漢者，雖遠必誅！ 可惜漢人文化精髓從明代起便入歧途， 加上滿清和猶太共產的摧殘，至今庸才當道， 精英散與市井，真是陰盛陽衰,不忍直視。連你媽周邊幾個屎一樣存在的印，韓，緬， 越都搞不定， 更不用提及民間漢文化自信與復興了。。。當今所謂"韓流"？就是那個個打扮成gay一般的雞八毛嗎？看來我是"out"了。

A reasonablely good analysis: China's Type 055 Super Destroyer Is A Reality Check For The US And Its Allies This is one impressive ship that underlines China's changing weapons development capabilities and its emerging greater naval strategy in the region and beyond. By Tyler RogowayJune 28...

Why people say duo-band, while in fact type 055 is quatro-band (X band, S band, C band, and UFH band)?

If you're not here to troll, then it gonna be easy. Developing full spectrum capabilities, constantly making the technologies better, is the goal of a world-class navy that China aspires to. So developing tech of ship-based ABM is 1) out of the need for a technology/knowledge accumlation, since...

I love how are the Western media always term 055 as " making it the most powerful destroyer in Asia. " :rofl: As if outside Asia, e.g. America or Europe, it will not be the most powerful. This sour grape mentality is priceless! :lol:

China is not the US. I guess you'll have to get used to the fact for the rest of your life, won't you? :lol: "Anywhere around the world" & "interventionist power " are not 2 concepts that are mutually exclusive. Imagine that I jet around the world on vacations, must I be an interventionist...

But where is the IRBM threat to China? A good question! So China can stop developing High Speed Rail now, cuz where is the railway threat to China? :rofl: ------ Now, China develops technologies for the sake of technology advancement, not only for any imminent threat. Where's IRBM threat...

So it gonna be guaranteed saturation attack, no chance of survival even for Ford-Class carrier, let alone Zumwalt, AB 2 or AB 3 :rofl:

Of course it can. HQ26 is the SM-3 equivalent. Strictly speaking both of them are anti-IRBM ( intermediate range ballistic missles).

055 VID, VID, VID! http://overseas.weico.cc/share/3228759.html?weibo_id=4123633514865177 http://video.sina.com.cn/p/news/mil/doc/2017-06-28/152366520607.html?wm=3049_0027&from=qudao

Say 22 YJ18 16 YU8 32 HQ19 26 CJ10 32X4 HQ26 The most awesome fire power on the planet! :lol:

Just found out more photos:

It probably is the most powerful destroyer in the world now, more powerful than Zumwalt DDG 1000...

Japan's Science&Technology Ministry just published a new research paper concluding that global science & technology has stepped into the era of Sino-American competition. This Japanese govenment research has ranked top 10% of globally quoted sci-tech research papers as a measure of one's...

With its 2 dozens ASBM (DF-21D) on board, the more important purpose of such a beast is to equalise Nimitz & Ford carriers for the time being in a potential stand-off situations - think about it both carrier-based F18s and P8 are useless against this beast. This could drastically elevate...

DDG 1000 is by and large a failure so far, and it will not be the soul & spirit of US Navy workhorses in the foreseeable future, unlike flight III Arleigh Burke. DDG 1000 mainly targets at sea-to-land attack against mid & small sized opponents that don't have formidable naval forces . It's...

I think the only true competitor of 055 in sight would be future Flight III Arleigh Burke.

They're not even in the same league. 128 "VLS" ( on top of that, will be permanently half-empty) is far less lethal than 055's 112(?) super dupper VLS . We've passed elementary numbers count here, have we?

That thing looks horrible, man! ----- BTW, is 055 the most lethal destroyer (or cruiser) in the world right now?

It seems that the similar happened to Korea, which again proved China's ownership of Korea: after Qing Dynasty was defeated in a naval battle with Japan prior to WW1, Japan forced Qing Dynasty signed unequal treaty (i.e. had China's permission) to give up Taiwan and Korea. That's why Korea and...