I think you are right. By looking very closely at that area where the missile was suppose to be one can notice 2 to 3 nudged circular impressions with different texture.
I read at two three different places here on PDF and no body seemed to disagree with it so I assumed it was a correct report. I couldn't find at the moment where i read it accept for post 617 of this thread.
Can someone else also confirm if we did or did not receive 5 more JF-17s from China...
But you have to note that this is only the current production rate, I am sure it will only go up from here. If it is 17/yr right now then after an year it should be 20+, I could be wrong. Also.. I think not just Pakistan/PAC will be making it but we will be getting planes from China too. Didn't...
There are actually 52 weeks in a calendar year. 364 days/7 = 52 weeks.
By that PAC's current production rate for JF-17 will be 52/3 = 17.33/year, not bad yar!:pakistan:
Brother, the link is not working. Can you please fix it
-----------------------------------
It worked when I copy pasted, thanks for the video! Nice work! I really liked the music and the song, though i couldn't understand much of it :)
What's weird about it?? It's evident that the same Indian report she is countering she is also accusing, not the other Indian report which she is countering with. Also, if you are countered with a Pakistani media report you will trash it, so this is the only way of countring it.
Thanks for attempting to explain..
It's a JF-17/FC-1 model without any doubt and no where I indicated I mind Sri Lankans putting JF-17s model or purchasing the AC, on the contrary I will be v much delighted.
I think this pic was taken in Pakistan (I could be wrong) because I do think it...
Isn't it strange that there is a JF-17 model, and that also a v big one, on a side table in post 4 picture. It would have made sense if it was Pakistan and we had displayed our plane but why would Sri Lankans do it?
------------------
'Sri Lankan' thanks for the pics...
Guys, don't you think this thread should be moved out of the Pakistan's 'Military Aviation' section? I don't think it has anything to do with our air force or military aviation.
I think it should be moved to 'General Defence' section.
I am not saying anything about Kashmiris wanting to be part of Pakistan. That's a separate debate. Here I only pointed out their desire to separate from India. So this makes more than half of your response irrelevant.
Regarding the so called COIN operation there, Ok I agree that given the size...
Well, the question here should be whether the Kashmiris want to be with India or not. Not that whether they want to be with Pakistan or not.
If you think that they want to be with India then why the hell you need 6 lakhs troops there since ever to keep Kashmir under Indian control...