Search results

Sorry, I can't.

Mostly incorrect and out of date.

No, it has not.

Garbage in, garbage out. That's what Internet is all about. Never take it too serious.

Jan. 11, 2010: 新华社北京１月１１日电 中国１１日在境内进行了一次陆基中段反导拦截技术试验，试验达到了预期目的。这一试验是防御性的，不针对任何国家。 Jan. 27, 2013: 新华网北京１月２７日电（记者钱彤）记者２７日晚从国防部新闻事务局获悉，２０１３年１月２７日，中国在境内再次进行了陆基中段反导拦截技术试验，试验达到了预期目的。这一试验是防御性的，不针对任何国家。 July 23, 2014: 记者从国防部新闻事务局获悉，2014年7月23日，中国在境内进行了一次陆基反导技术试验，试验达到了预期目的。

Why so sure?:-)

It is too early to make a conclusion.

Thanks to TaihuLight, which has made it much easier.

Nope. There are numerous projects, including HGVs, scramjets as well as combined cycle engines, under “Major Project 16”. Most of them are meant for experiment while others have “background models”.

This is merely an artist's impression:laugh:

I am afraid the "400 km" 40N6 is not ready for export yet.

o_O

Thanks. It should be noted that the jammer is only a part of the whole suite that has been replaced.

The above data was collected in 2015. The clocks installed on Beidou 3 has a day stability reaches the order of magnitude of E-15, which is comparable to the stability of Rb clocks installed on GPS Block IIF as well as the forthcoming GLONASS-K2, better than the clocks installed on Galileo.

That's correct.

This is called Z-8G.

Not true. Reason seen above.

Update. The author has corrected the error.

The article about DF-17 seems to be self-contradictory.

The cost has been overestimated by over one-third.