Search results

Telling the truth is not disparaging. Obsessed with fantasies might be one of our unfavorable natures. Exaggerating past achievements, overestimating ourselves and underestimating others also let us make bad judgments. Good judgment helps you deduce more information from limited clues...

Well, what's the meaning of trolling B-21? Did we build anything comparable? Actually, we haven't ever developed any bomber fully independently.

I have always wanted to start a thread about these epic PR fails. This is China, not Russia:disagree:

This article was simply done by copy and paste and quoting remarks out of context.

Why take second-hand information from Wikipedia so seriously while looking down upon those first-hand sources?:-)

No, but there will be.

Nope. It's Type 910, an underwater weapon test ship.

I suppose you mean 09IIIA?

Sorry, I don't see the causality. The mentioned "new nuclear submarine" was actually completed in "the past five years since the 18th National Congress of the CPC" (2012-2017).

Isn't this a totally made up story though?o_O

Really? Could you please enlighten me...

Seems wulff gives us a pretty decent guess.

Of course, but they are meant for YJ-18A.

I believe all modules are deep enough since the length of the land-attack cruise missile is less than 7 meters.

The answer is no, or not for now, and it has been confirmed by several sources. The combat system on 052D and 055 resembles the upgreadable AEGIS, which ensures the exploitation of its potential (in the form similar to Baselines).

You mean those modified 09IV?

Those so called 094A are nothing more than fantasy.

It's not even 055o_O