Source?
Also
"He said, however, that Russia does not know where exactly the FSA is or who heads it."
We really want them to be our allies right after they give us this information.
Apparently negotiations = material support in your dictionary.
Focus monsieur, we are talking about how the UK supports terrorists.
btw how much has France given to these jihadis?
You do realize no one takes you guys seriously right? After the whole Iraq WMD fiasco, your media and officials have zero credibility.
But continue providing comedic relief please.
Nothing = 0 GBP
5 million GBP = 5,000,000 GBP = Material support to terrorists.
Your government sponsors terrorism. I don't know why you find it so hard to accept.
QOTW
"The UK hasn't given anything to anyone in Syria, not even the Free Syrian Army." -Steve781
I am not sure about the exact number of bunkers but I can speak on population dispersal. People were given considerable incentives to move out east and into remote parts of the country.
We have a feeling that something big is going down. NATO has gone mad and is sponsoring cannibal jihadis all...
"The UK hasn't given anything to anyone in Syria, not even the Free Syrian Army. " - Steve781
Gave them 5 million pounds that were used to spread terror against the UN recognized government of Syria.
UK = jihadi sponsors
"The UK hasn't given anything to anyone in Syria, not even the Free Syrian Army. " - Steve781
A demonstration why the UK is not taken seriously by anyone 9 and above.
What you are seeing are the last moments of an empire based on debt and lies. They will moan and they will whine (as witnessed in this thread). But in the end civilization and humanity will always win.
Yep, we specialize in sending jihadis to the afterlife. Russia will continue bombing these animals until the last one stops moving.
Then we will turn our attention to people who sponsored them.
Name calling, When you have lost the argument.
Hopefully now you understand why no one takes you seriously any more.
Go cry some more over your dead jihadi assets.
The most reputable source of information in the world. Wall Street Journal.
Thanks for the laugh.
And since you posted a western source on this topic. Here is another one.
Syria intervention plans fuelled by oil interests, not chemical weapon concerns | Nafeez Ahmed | Environment | The...
Were actually counting on it. That way we will have an excuse to establish a bigger presence in Syria and use more powerful weaponry in wider airstrikes.
So basically, they can support the rebels or not. We win either way.