Search results

53 million $ to upgrade a helicopter????!!Some countries are paying 25 million/ piece to upgrade an F16 blk50 to V standard!

Turkey was defending the 7 per dollar threshold which was a total waste.

They actually won already as Turkey burned its reserves to defend the lira.You can bring it back to 7 but at what cost ? Tens of billions $ wiped out.

It depends on what missiles you want to buy. The RN will use CAMM in the same VLS as the FREMM, so the end user can just switch from Aster to CAMM just like the RN will.So will the Italians but only 2 CAMM ER per cell, not 4.

Sylver is quadpacked for CAMM and it can take 2 CAMM ER per cell.

Both the Turks and Greeks can consider it extra training

They were just flying in the areea where his helicopter was during a visit to some island.

At least I can read a list and what aid means.

https://www.wristband.com/content/which-countries-provide-receive-most-foreign-aid/ Ofcourse we could never compete with the economic powerhouse that is Afghanistan....btw, how much in EU taxpayers money does it cost us to upkeep you and other boat people in here? @Agha Sher

No....I disagree. Exactly, being part of the EU meant a whole chunk of our industry shut down or taken over by EU multinationals.Again....18 out of 27 countries in the EU receive more money than they contribute and structural funds are not aid.Romania saw bigger economic growth before joining...

18 out of 27 member countries get more than they contribute. A subsidy means you can't function without which is not true and the issue is much more complex than saying it's aid which is not and it ain't called that. They would call it that if it was aid.Besides, the EU even takes money from...

What countries exactly? 18 of the 27 EU countries are net financial receivers. If you want an economic union you have to stabilise that whole union financially or to give them a chance to compete.I won't even go in to the fact that most of the money go to EU multinationals operating there. If...

Nope....structural funds are different. For example, if a country relies on coal for energy but EU rules forbid coal because of pollution, they will give you funds to shut coal mines down and build alternative energy supplies. Etc.,etc

Those are structural funds, not aid.It helps EE countries allign themselves to EU policies,all EU countries get them....in the 80s 90s countries like Spain benefited from them,etc.

My home country doesn't get aid, sorry,youareterribly confused.As a refugee in the EU you shouldn't worry about an EU citizen exercising his free right to travel across the Union.

What exactly am I complaining about? My empire? Pointing out historical truths is not complaining. Lol....you're one deluded fellow

Most historians agree that the Eastern Roman empire is a continuation of the Roman empire,so,our personal opinions don't matter. Byzantine empire is a term used after its fall,throughout its existence they were known as the Roman empire. Simple

The Byzantines saw themselves as Romans rather than Greeks and, usually their empire is seen as a continuation of the Roman empire in the east. Even Mehmet tried to portray himself as a Roman emperor.

Christianity had martyrs long before the existence of Islam.Even the word is of Greek origin not Arabic.

Let him be....I was just pointing out the historical circumstances that led to the Islamic expansion. In my opinion, the Romans and Iranians exhausting themselves in endless, ruinous wars was a prime factor in allowing the Arabs to burst out like they did. Ofcourse,discussing history on PDF...