Search results

@Khafee Can you specifically point out what exactly did I say wrong?It will help us all.

It isn't that easy, read this- http://spie.org/newsroom/5614-ir-imaging-seekers-may-be-very-resistant-to-laser-jamming

@MastanKhan I dont need to apologize because I "read" a lot of reports and do my homework much more throughly than a LOT of members here. I have interacted with people at helm of affairs at this side of the border and thanks to a much more transparent system in place...

Hi dear @A.P. Richelieu And what do you think determines the hit probability?As I have mentioned time and again,perhaps you repeatedly fail to miss the point,that an IIR guided missile has an active imager that takes the image of the target at a certain rate...

I've already done so, kindly read my previous posts thoroughly. My main point is a missile with fire and forget feather is inherently superior to a missile without it.that's all!

@A.P. Richelieu Instead of blatantly saying things you have no idea about, why don't you prove me wrong? I've worked on some of the algorithms I've mentioned above my friend. And as for obstructing the beam, one can indeed use "smoke" and other laser jammers. An IIR guided missile is always...

Hi dear @MastanKhan I would tend to disagree with some of your remarks.The first and foremost reason as to why india did not cross the LOC was ATAL BIHARI VAJPAYEE. He had strictly instructed the military to not cross borders and attack pakistan,even when a...

Hi my dear @A.P. Richelieu This is not entirely correct,the IIR seeker has an "imager" as well. You can not fool it easily by chaff and flares.Kindly note,I am specifically talking about Imaging Infra Red and not just IR. Image correlation is an...

Hi dear @A.P. Richelieu I fail to understand as to how the technology to ride laser beam is latest?It is not even fire and forget! The operator has to constantly point the beam to the target till the missile hits it. I find it hard to accept anything that...

Smoke maybe?

I dont understand why do certain indian members talk about LCH when the thread is about RBS-70. I mean,I dont think anyone(pakistani member) was even comparing LCH against RBS. GURU DUTT is a pure troll. @Oscar

Yeah sure why not! I was merely responding to your comment wherein you stated that above two Indian AESA radars were from PIT

@Bilal Khan 777 I'm afraid your information is in-correct, the radar you're talking about is "rohini", the base line version of which was indeed based on TRS-17 from PIT.LRDE did in fact buy comprehensive technology rights from IPRs to production right from PIT back in 2001.that's the reason why...

@randomradio Sorry for being off topic,but LRDE's arudra and ashwin AESA radars feature digital beam forming.This is possible thanks to individual ADC modules attached at every antenna element. This is what renders true "multi-beam forming" capability.

Hi dear @The Deterrent So,you're trying to allude to the point that pakistan somehow have an indigenous turbofan(miniaturized) program?Can you shed some light on this aspect. Which lab in pakistan has design experience with gas turbines? I know I am sure I...

My point was GSLV MK 3, launch has been successful. The new launcher will only enhance its capacity especially when SCE 200 comes online. It'll be more powerful than the Chinese semi cryogenic engine .Ours will have 2000kN thrust

Hi dear @Genesis The first successful launch of MK3 took place on 18th december 2014! Kindly google before you make a statement. Second launch featuring fully functional "gas generator" based cryogenic engine 220kN of thrust will take place this december. I happen...

TATA has designed kestral,i think this is kestral,isnt it?

Hi dear @500 India has GSLV MK3 as well that can take 8000kgs into LEO and 4000-5000kgs in GTO in itz current form. However once ISRO replace the main stage that currently uses vikas engine with SCE-200(under advanced stages of development),then the payload capacity will...

How exactly a radar with "smaller" PAP can have detection range larger than a radar with much higher PAP? PAP-power aperature product! Considering the signal processing aspect aside,just this fact alone makes the entire article as written by fanboys.