Search results

The practical battlefield effectiveness of drones only goes so far due to their very nature. Usually best suited for environments where the enemy doesn't have tiered AD or a viable air-presence that denies their tactical use (research why the M777 is good for Afghanistan but horrible for...

Sounds feasible given the circumstances. I think TheImmortal is spot-on with what's been going on lately. Israel/US have stepped up their assassination campaign in Iran, to what end idk but they're on the move that much is for certain.

Respect owed to where it is deserved! It’s a super clean looking set up as well!

Off topic, but I respect your Profile Picture. Been a longtime fan of Berserk myself, always appreciate seeing others also enjoying such a seminal manga series!

Don't give me false hope lmfao

It must be a mixture of misplaced priorities, problematic domestic defense initiatives, incompetence, maybe they simply don’t want to defend the sites or lack the physical equipment to do so in numbers lol. Every time I hear these stories of a quad-copter or drones penetrating these sensitive...

Idk brother, the IRGC has struck Israel several times but these operations don’t seem to be establishing any deterrence against future sabotage/assassinations in Iran. The Erbil strike (whether successful or not) is a step in the right direction but without an increased tempo followed up by...

Agreed. It can be easily argued that one of the hallmarks of American culture in general is the glorification of violence itself and the use of it to solve most problems. Every problem looks like a nail when the only tool you have to deal with it is a hammer...

You touch upon a very tender point of contention here in the United States, that being the absolutely sordid levels of rampant mental illness (in all its forms) affecting tens of millions of Americans everyday. My own University degree was in Psychology and we had to go through many different...

I’m not of the opinion that the Zionist entity will use nuclear weapons right off the bat or even if they’re losing. It’s to their benefit to agree towards some sort of diplomatic settlement if a war is waged and they’re on the losing end. This isn’t the Arab-Israeli wars of the 20th century...

I think the debate over whether or not IRGC AEROSPACE MISSILE FORCES can adequately strike all of the Zionist entity is essentially over Salar-jan. The answer is sobering to anyone who wants to acknowledge it. Iranian ability to conduct comprehensive pin-point strikes VIA long-range missiles...

Still holding out hope that Iran will conduct some sort of comprehensive retaliatory attack on Zionist assets in occupied Palestine but even for me, my hopes are waning. This war is going to happen sooner or later anyways.

Payload also factors into range.

This is what I had some concerns about but I'm glad heavy-hitting, game changing Iranian weapons are making their way into Hezbollah's hands. Makes you wonder what else has made it through?

Well, there’s gonna be an increase in Zionist airstrikes then. No Russians to hang around and make the Israelis maybe not strike lol. Idk what to exactly make of this.

One can only hope that this is indeed the case. But arming Iran with such weapons might be a bridge too far for them even given current global circumstances. Fair weather friends at best my dear Ich.

Can't argue with you there brother, it's a lose-lose scenario. Iran has swallowed a very bitter-pill that will stay with the nation/people for quite some time until they feel they're ready to kill someone of equal importance in the United States (if that's still something they want to do)...

I also want to humbly add that the goal militarily shouldn't be centered around the neutralization of enemy retaliatory/offensive capacity but the means to defend ones own territory and the ability to strike back at some meaningful level. Realistically you'll never be able to fully negate...

It's not that Iran will "win" or come out on top without any doubt (any conflict will see massive amounts of destruction being inflicted upon Iran). Realistically all I'm saying is that the Iranian nation has vast/viable means to dish out insane amounts of destruction. That's all really...

The USN doesn't deploy all twelve Carrier Battle Groups at once, this would be require massive resource/monetary spending as well as domestic political support for such an undertaking. And no, a single American carrier group doesn't have enough firepower to outgun Iran (nuclear weapons...