Search results

Ok ill concede my point. Apologies. Still find it funny that Russia has to rely on other countries, but i guess it makes sense. Lets see how Iranian UAVs perform in this conflict

I wonder if we will ever end up buying the chinese y20. Seems pretty good for transporting stuff such as artillery and tanks. Can be used for large scale airborne operations too. C130s are good but having something heavier along with it doesnt hurt.

What i mean is its pretty funny that Russia has to resort to countries such as NK and Iran for equipment. Very embarassing.

Lol let them cry. F-16 block 70/72 for Pakistan when?????

What is this?

Not surprising if true which i doubt it is. USAF still leads the world when it comes to electronic aviation equipment. They have developed unreal stuff over the last 2 decades

Yep. Equipment needs update asap. In my opinion we need a modular AR like platform.

US failure in Afghanistan was because they did not know much about the culture and geography. In most encounters with the Taliban they won, however the Taliban could easily wait and strike when they wanted to. A big reason Pakistan won against TTP was because the army knew their mindset. Had ANA...

The truth lies somewhere in between. Western media is largely overexaggerating but sources such as 5pillars who have gone to afghanistan say that it isnt as bad as people say.

I have heard from people who have had experience visiting POF factories and western factories that POF uses older machining tools. So it is not far fetched to say that western equipment will have better finishing than local products, not to say our domestic industry makes unreliable weapons but...

7.62x51 is too heavy to be the standard round for pakistan army. It weighs around twice the mass of 7.62x39 and 5.56x45. At most only 1 or 2 soldiers in a squad should have a battle rifle firing such a cartridge. NATO experimented with having 7.62x51 as the standard round bit found it to be too...

7.62x51 is too heavy to be the standard round for pakistan army. It weighs around twice the mass of 7.62x39 and 5.56x45. At most only 1 or 2 soldiers in a squad should have a battle rifle firing such a cartridge. NATO experimented with having 7.62x51 as the standard round but found it to be too...

I agree, i am of the opinion that 5.56x45 is superior to 7.62x39 but if we ever choose to induct 5.56 as the standard round we must be very careful.

These look very good, im not sure if inducting 5.56 into PA infantry weapons would be very wise though. Otherwise these look excellent especially for SF, would be a great replacement to aging m4a1s.