What's new

Search results

  1. P

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    That is very weird. What kind of jobs were the visas for ? Once the plant is set up, the jobs would be low end maintenance jobs. Salary in India would normally be higher than that in Pakistan. Why would anyone from India want to work there so far from their family? It sounds like a conspiracy...
  2. P

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    What information was shared? And who was the person in India who received this information? Do you know any details or are you just repeating some conspiracy theory?
  3. P

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Which Jindal brother has a mining deal in Afghanistan and why will that deal be signed with the Sharif family? Do they own mines in Afghanistan? Which ones ?
  4. P

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    What details did she provide to India? Where did she get these details from ? It is quite unlikely that the ISI would have given her a briefing with details of individual militants. Here comes a Y- iya who runs away every time he is asked for facts or logic.
  5. P

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Did Benazir carry the nuclear secrets in her pocket and slip them to Kim ? Or was nuclear know - how transferred in return for North Korean missile tech at a government level ? By the way, AQ Khan had also said Imran was immature in his thoughts and does "cosmetic politics". What deals have...
  6. P

    Asia cup is total disrespect to Pakistan and world cricket by indian BCCI.

    The point is that Pakistan should not get any financial benefit from playing India. As long as that doesn't happen, there is no problem playing against them. India will obviously not pull out of the world cup just because Pakistan is also playing. I don't think so, but even if that were true...
  7. P

    Asia cup is total disrespect to Pakistan and world cricket by indian BCCI.

    The Government of India has a policy of not engaging with Pakistan until support for terrorism stops. The impact on cricket is: 1. Pakistani players are not allowed in IPL and Indian players not allowed in Pakistan's league. 2. India will not tour Pakistan for bilateral series 3 India will not...
  8. P

    Asia cup is total disrespect to Pakistan and world cricket by indian BCCI.

    Please excuse Pakistani English.
  9. P

    Asia cup is total disrespect to Pakistan and world cricket by indian BCCI.

    India has a long standing policy that the cricket team will not play in Pakistan. Pakistan had many options 1. They could have insisted the tournament be held in Pakistan without India 2. They could have decided not to participate if the tournament was shifted from Pakistan. 3. They could have...
  10. P

    No Pakistani General has ever succeeded; not will Asim Munir!

    In MBS' case, the decoupling from the West is really driven by Biden who had promised to make him a pariah during his election campaign. Saudis would have preferred to deal with the US rather than China as long as they were not going to receive lectures about democracy and human rights. The Gulf...
  11. P

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Sure, display your ignorance. The person who first called Jinnah kafir e azam was Mazhar Ali Azhar, who left his substantial property in India behind to move to Pakistan after partition.
  12. P

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    The greatest fool can ask more questions than the wisest man can answer.
  13. P

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Anyone can call someone else something else. Why was Mr Jinnah called Kafir-e- Azam ?
  14. P

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Jinnah created an unnatural state that was suspectible to being broken up by the slightest tension. Even if Bhutto had allowed Mujib to take power, the implementation of the six point programme would ultimately have led to separation. It might have been less bloody, but it was inevitable.
  15. P

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Lol, Modi is neither a mass murderer nor a head of state. Please don't display your utter ignorance in public.
  16. P

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    And look how Pakistan turned out. East and West Pakistan were at each other's throats within a few years of Jinnah's death. That is what happens when you make unprincipled compromises.
  17. P

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Very good. That is exactly what the PMLN , PPP, Pakistani military and the rest of establishment has been doing - compromising for their principles. Are you talking about Yahya or Bhutto ?
  18. P

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Not just India, leaders from other countries also refused to talk to him directly. Despite Pakistan practically begging for it, Biden didn't even talk to him on phone. Putin invited him to Moscow just to show the world that a major Muslim country's Prime Minister was visiting Russia the day...
  19. P

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Kuch samajh nahi aaya. Khan said don't compromise on principles and still appointed biggest daaku as President of his party. If that is not compromising principles, then what is ? Please write your response in Urdu ( in Roman script) if you can't explain your ideas in English.
  20. P

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Like you said, he is a media savvy person and communicates to the audience he cares about. His audience doesn't care about Ravish Kumar or Barkha Dutt. They have a limited audience and they anyway would not be sympathetic to what he has to say. He can consistently win elections without giving...
Back
Top Bottom