@PersonasNonGrata you constantly bring rejoining Pakistan. during United Pakistan, East Pakistan and West Pakistan were very much separate. and afterwards, the issue is about close relations with Pakistan because of the shared past and potential for mutual benefit in future. and very...
i will not support Luffy 500 if he denies detailed evidence. similarly i think it is madness to deny the violence that was instigated and backed up by India and Soviet Union. seems you are accusing someone of the same things that you are committing. for example when one says "3 million were...
first, there was no liberation. the only way one can say Indian annexation is liberation is for him to be an Indian. most of those very children are the reason that 1) Sheikh Mujib became very disliked after 1971 and 2) some of those commie children who broke United Pakistan also killed Sheikh...
as with so many choices in life on this planet, it is hard to make a black-and-white sweeping justification for one 'ism' over another. for a start, for a Muslim and for a nation like BD, the mere suggestion that Islam should be uprooted from one aspect of life and society is absurd. even in a...
this Mattrixx claims to be a Bangladeshi, but hates every bit of the history of the subcontinental Muslim community. he wishes Muslims did not come to South Asia and civilizations did not spring up. considering that he is a Muslim as he claims, what kind of low life actually hates their own...
lame analogy.
all that the indian establishment needs is an excuse to spread its grimy reach over more of South Asia and beyond. AQ is a convenient excuse. Modi can also advance his scheme of Muslim-cleansing in India itself that way.
i don't think even many sane Indians would deny this
US did not want one half of its ally to be destroyed, something you would have probably wanted. to the US, it was their ally. but to you, it was your own country. there is the irony.
is there any doubt what a Soviet-sponsored Indian operation (that the 1971 crisis was) would turn into? there...
Sheikh Mujib would have committed the atrocity if he did not get into the fight within the leftist forces that India and Soviet Union propped up. Sheikh Mujib still did commit atrocities but on a different people than the ones you are showing so much violent bigotry towards
a vassal state can also be recognized as a regular country. i don't think the people of the Bangladesh landmass ever wanted an "independence" to become the colony of a hostile country. you want to say Bangladeshi people were all willing to become Indian vassal?
do you think the CPI should allow all the proud Maoist patriots of India to finish off their opposition?
which country are you talking about here? India? JeI opposed the 1971 Indian annexation for what? you think you can change the meaning of patriot or the basic expectations from a nation's...
presence of Indian 'shackles' is a light of saying how Indian menace has gripped our country and society. we should more-than-trade with Pakistan. as for India, it is not up to us to cooperate with them. they will force to 'cooperate' with them when they need to. they have been doing this for a...
"al qaeda" means a couple of things at most. it means more dirty work by Indian military and intelligence to expand Indian terror in South Asia. it also means Indian military and intelligence exercising more power to control and coerce its own citizens
God's law is anti-humanity? i guess you would think different if you were Muslim
you are just not well-read on these maybe because you were never too interested. if you were, you would also include BAL to that list.
India-backed BAL created JMB et al. during BNP-JI term with prime intention of destabilizing Bangladesh and justify Indian dirty work in BD. JMB can be said to be "al qaeda" (whatever the f that means) that Bangladesh Awami League created
@FNFAL
execution of so called atheist bloggers;
demand of blasphemy law;
cancellation of the country's [delusional feminist-appealing policy]
ban on the mixing of men and women in public;
end to "shameless behavior and dresses"; and
rule that the Ahmadiyya sect as non-Muslim.
you tell me...
if you think ending and starting your posts with lines like "do you see how stupid that is" gets your point across, i don't have much on that. simply, living under Indian hegemony and as a vassal is not the height of sovereignty we as a people can achieve. if you think coming out of the shackles...
i am amused by your "(my) type of mullah" comment. my type of 'mullah' does not even have intermediate orientation in Islami ain-kanun. it's not easy to become a mullah.
i was just quoting I. Gandhi about the 1000 years thing. frankly i don't think this secular-to-Hindu society that current...
@kalu_miah we should go back to the Yuri Bezmenov interview and any testimony by similar people who knew what India was doing behind the scenes. it seems Yuri Bezmenov had a real soul searching and eventually realized that a lot of the Soviet-sponsored espionage work of destabilizing weak...
i think everyone at least here knows there is no real organization called "al qaeda". it's just a term used for branding by Western media.
but anyways a lot bigger problem for South Asia is Hindutva fundamentalism